Dryness fraction of saturated steam

AI Thread Summary
When saturated steam is expanded isentropically across a turbine, the expected decrease in dryness fraction can sometimes lead to unexpected results, as seen in this discussion. The problem involves a saturated steam mixture at 330°C with a vapor fraction of 0.5, expanded to 150°C, where calculations showed an increase in dryness fraction instead. The calculations for enthalpy and entropy were performed using standard formulas, but the results raised questions about the assumptions made, particularly regarding isentropic efficiency. It was noted that a low initial vapor fraction could affect the outcome, suggesting that the exercise might not accurately reflect real-world conditions. The discussion highlights the complexities involved in thermodynamic calculations related to steam expansion.
maserati1969
Messages
24
Reaction score
3
Thread moved from the technical forums to the schoolwork forums
Hi all, any thoughts on the following problem please?

When saturated steam is expanded isentropically across a turbine, the dryness fraction should decrease. However, when I calculated the answer to the following question, it actually increased slightly. Any ideas where I went wrong?

Question:
Saturated steam mixture at temperature 330°C with vapour mixture fraction of 0.5 is flowing through a turbine at a flow rate of 6 kg/s. Steam is expanded isentropically to temperature 150°C at the turbine exit. Assume that the turbine external walls are fully insulated (adiabatic turbine). Calculate enthalpy at exit.

My solution:
Using enthalpy formula at inlet (3300C) and data from table: h1 = hf +x.hfg
h1 = 2095.95 kJ/kg
Is isentropic so s1 = s2 So entropy at inlet: s1 = sf +x.sfg
s1 = 4.4969 kJ/kg.K also = s2
Therefore at 150 degrees C: entropy: 4.4969 = 1.8418 + (x.4.9953)
Therefore x = 0.53151 (This should decrease, not increase)
Now use new ‘x’ value for h2:
h2 = 632.18 + (0.53151.2113.8)
h2 = 1755.7 kJ/kg

Many thanks in advance.
Regards
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi,

I get the same result. Perhaps the exercise composer didn't worry about reality. 100% isentropic efficiency ?
And ##x_{in}=0.5## is low: for ##x_{in}>0.55## it doesn't increase any more.

##\ ##
 
Thank you BvU
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top