Elastic Potential Energy and spring

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating elastic potential energy for a mass-spring system. The spring constant is 40.0 N/m, and the object is initially pulled 0.200 m downward. The formula for elastic potential energy, 0.5kx², is applied, but the user encounters confusion regarding the correct height and displacement values. At the release point (h = 0), the displacement x is -0.2 m, leading to an elastic potential energy of 0 J at h = 0.2 m, where x equals 0. Understanding the relationship between the point of release and equilibrium is crucial for accurate calculations.
wallace13
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
A 2.40 kg object is hanging from the end of a vertical spring. The spring constant is 40.0 N/m. The object is pulled 0.200 m downward and released from rest. Complete the table below by calculating the translational kinetic energy, the gravitational potential energy, the elastic potential energy, and the total mechanical energy E for each of the vertical positions indicated. The vertical positions h indicate distances above the point of release, where h = 0


I have already found kinetic and gravitational potential energy. I need to find elastic potential energy at h=0, .2, and .4m

Elastic Potential Energy= .5kx squared


.5(40)(.2)squared= .8 J

.8 J is the incorrect answer, but i know .5kx squared is the right equation... what am I doing wrong??


At this height (.2 above the release point) I found the correct kinetic energy to be .81 J and the correct gPE to be 4.7088 J
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm confused over the point of release and the equilibrium point.
Looks to me like the point of release is h = 0, x = -0.2.
So at h = 0.2, x = 0 and the Elastic PE = 0.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
44
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K