Electric Potential Energy of Point Charge Systems

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the electric potential energy of a system involving two charges, -Qo and +Q3, and the movement of +Q3 towards -Qo. The initial and final electric potential energies were calculated, leading to confusion over the correct answer between options C and D. It was clarified that options C and D pertain specifically to the interaction between -Qo and +Q3, not the entire three-charge system. The misinterpretation of the question and the assumption that all charges have the same magnitude contributed to the misunderstanding. Ultimately, the correct answer is D, indicating that the electric potential energy of the system decreases as +Q3 is moved closer to -Qo.
flyonthewall
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Two point charges of opposite sign, - Qo and +Qo, are fixed in place a distance D apart from each other, as shown in the figure, while a third point charge with positive charge + Q3 is initially located a long distance away on the line joining
- Qo and + Qo. An external force moves point charge +Q3 along the line until it is in its final position a distance D to the right of +Qo. Which of the following claims is true during the time that point charge + Q 3 is being moved from its initial position to its final position?

A) The work done by point charge +Qo on point charge +Q3 is positive.
B) The work done by the external force on point charge +Q3 is zero.
C) The electric potential energy of the (-Qo) (+Q3) system becomes higher.
D) The electric potential energy of the (-Qo)(+Q3) system becomes lower.
Relevant Equations
Ue = (kq1q2) / r
Here is my line of thinking:
I know A and B aren't correct since the work done would be negative since the electric force and displacement are in opposite directions. When calculating the electric potential energies to consider options C and D, I thought the initial electric potential energy of the system was -(kQ^2)/D and the final electric potential energy was the sum of the three pairs of electric potential energy so it would be -(kQ^2)/d + (kQ^2)/d - (kQ^2)/2D which simplifies to -(kQ^2) / 2D. Since the final electric potential energy would be a smaller negative, I chose option C, that the electric potential of the system would increase (which also seemed to make sense to me intuitively since the two positive charges are brought closer together which they don't "like" so there potential energy would increase). The correct answer is D though and I can't quite understand what I'm messing up on because the problem itself doesn't seem that challenging. Thank you in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello and welcome to PF!

Note that part (C) is referring to the potential energy of the system consisting of only the two charges (-Qo) and (+Q3). It is not referring to the potential energy of the system of all three charges.
 
flyonthewall said:
as shown in the figure,
The written description seems reasonably clear, but the diagram might be useful.
flyonthewall said:
while a third point charge with positive charge + Q3 is initially located a long distance away on the line joining - Qo and + Qo. An external force moves point charge +Q3 along the line until it is in its final position a distance D to the right of +Qo.
And so presumably 2D to the right of -Qo.
flyonthewall said:
Which of the following claims is true during the time that point charge + Q 3 is being moved from its initial position to its final position?

A) The work done by point charge +Qo on point charge +Q3 is positive.
B) The work done by the external force on point charge +Q3 is zero.
C) The electric potential energy of the (-Qo) (+Q3) system becomes higher.
D) The electric potential energy of the (-Qo)(+Q3) system becomes lower.
Relevant Equations: Ue = (kq1q2) / r

Here is my line of thinking:
I know A and B aren't correct since the work done would be negative since the electric force and displacement are in opposite directions.
For both A and B? B is not necessarily an electric force.
flyonthewall said:
When calculating the electric potential energies to consider options C and D, I thought the initial electric potential energy of the system was -(kQ^2)/D and the final electric potential energy was the sum of the three pairs of electric potential energy so it would be -(kQ^2)/d + (kQ^2)/d - (kQ^2)/2D which simplifies to -(kQ^2) / 2D.
You seem to be assuming all charges have magnitude Q. I read it that the third charge can have a different magnitude. But your main error is misreading the question. C and D refer to only -Qo and +Q3, not the three charge system.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top