Electrical flux passing through the cube

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving an electrical flux problem using a cube instead of cylindrical coordinates. Participants emphasize the application of Gauss's law, particularly in proving that the electric flux through the cube equals q/ε0. The importance of symmetry in integrating the flux is highlighted, suggesting that knowledge of the electric field can simplify the process. Questions arise about the relevance of surface shape in the equations used. Overall, the conversation centers on finding a method to calculate electric flux through a cube while adhering to established principles of electromagnetism.
MatinSAR
Messages
673
Reaction score
204
Homework Statement
Consider a rod with an electric charge density λ that passes through the center of the cube. Prove that the electric flux passing through this cube is equal to = q / ε0
Relevant Equations
Gauss's law
1647210501510.png

Picture for better understanding.
My answer :
1647211185819.png


I want to know how to solve this problem without using cylindrical. I mean how can we solve this using cube and its sides.
Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
MatinSAR said:
Relevant Equations:: Gauss's law

I want to know how to solve this problem without using cylindrical. I mean how can we solve this using cube and its sides.

What about your relevant equation ?

##\ ##
 
BvU said:
What about your relevant equation ?

##\ ##
Thank you ... but what do you mean by relevant equation?
 
Does your relevant equation worry about the shape of the surface ?

[edit]On the other hand,
Prove that the electric flux passing through this cube is equal to = q / ε0
could be interpreted as an invitation to show that for this case the gauss identity holds. In that case you could actually integrate the flux: you know the electric field (right?) and can benefit from symmetry.

##\ ##
 
Last edited:
BvU said:
Does your relevant equation worry about the shape of the surface ?
I guess no it doesn't ... Thank you for your help ...
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top