- #71
Maaneli
- 520
- 0
Coldcall said:Maaneli,
About your claim that we know quantum experiences time. I looked this up in my nw version of John Barrow's "New Theories of everything".
Under the chapter title: "The Quantum mystery of Time"
He starts the first paragrapgh by saying:
"In quantum theory the status of time is an even greater mystery than it appeared to Einstein and Newton. IF it exists in a transcedent way then it is not one of those quantities subject to the famous Uncertainty Principle of Heisenberg..."
Okay? Just plain english and common sense. And from a great mathematician too
I guess he should go back to school and learn more maths because he doesn't agree with your point about classical time being applied to quantum fundamentals?
LOL, I don't think you understood what he means. He's not denying that there is a time parameter in QM and that wavefunctions have a time-dependent evolution. What he is worrying about is the physical interpretation of the time parameter in QM, and rightly so if he is starting from the assumption that the orthodox intepretation of QM and the HUP is fundamentally correct.