- #36
zomgwtf
- 66
- 2
It all started with someones comment about being SOL.
Then:
How many philosophies talk of souls in such a way? You can hardly try to say that you weren't discussing a specific religious idea of the soul.
Regardless I was specifically referring to this post. Pretty much conclusively discussing an old testament use of the word soul.
As for my comment, you had even quoted it and commented on it:
I guess that clears things up, I didn't say 'specific religious forms of the soul'. Maybe the problem is that I didn't refer to pretty specific old testament interpretations on the use of the word soul? I hardly felt that was necessary considering the discussion going on previously.
Then:
If there's a soul; you may find it's going to be stuck on a spit and toasted.
Better that there's no soul. No soul, no consequences.
I agree.
Ditto.
How many philosophies talk of souls in such a way? You can hardly try to say that you weren't discussing a specific religious idea of the soul.
{bolding mine}I'll probably have to get a pre-owned Soul. Which is kind of a drag since it will come with someone else's sins.
Regardless I was specifically referring to this post. Pretty much conclusively discussing an old testament use of the word soul.
As for my comment, you had even quoted it and commented on it:
{bolding mine again}DaveC426913 said:I know of no other kind.zomgwtf said:I've no idea why people are talking about specific religious forms of the soul in this thread... especially since this is supposed to a philosophy forum.
I'm going to guess that the philosphy field has adopted the term soul to apply to some other setof criteria? That was kind of dumb.
I guess that clears things up, I didn't say 'specific religious forms of the soul'. Maybe the problem is that I didn't refer to pretty specific old testament interpretations on the use of the word soul? I hardly felt that was necessary considering the discussion going on previously.
Last edited: