- #71
zomgwtf
- 66
- 2
Frame Dragger said:It means the theory isn't really a theory, just a hope or guess. You might have a pet dragon, as unlikely as I find the concept. Then again, there is quite a bit of evidence to support the notion that Dragon could never have existed, so my confidence is implicitly connected to my conviction that dragons are fictional. I am yet to see the proof (which as you say is indeed the burden of the 'prosecution') of a soul, but I'm yet to see related phenomena explained away as well as dragons.
How else can you explain the burn marks that appear on the floor and roof? Ohhhh for cases like this, the kind that aren't engraved into the human condition by our history, we turn to science. You would probably conduct some sort of experiment to show conclusively that there is no dragon. We make special conditions for other things though, only when they are well deserving!
By the way, I'm still sticking to my guns, there IS a dragon.
EDIT: by the way, imagine that the test we conducted showed that young hooligans were coming into my garage and making scorch marks thinking it was funny that I believed it to be a dragon. Would it be crazy for me to still believe in the dragon?