Finding the magnitude of the electrostatic force from a thin rod

AI Thread Summary
To find the electrostatic force on an electron near a uniformly charged thin rod, the problem requires integrating the contributions from each infinitesimal segment of the rod, as Coulomb's law applies only to point charges. The total charge Q can be divided by the length L of the rod to determine charge density, and the distance from the electron to each segment must be adjusted accordingly. The standard formula for the force between point charges, F = k*q1*q2/r^2, is insufficient for this scenario due to the continuous nature of the charge distribution. Calculus, specifically integration, is necessary to accurately compute the total force acting on the electron. Understanding these concepts is crucial for solving the problem effectively.
nuagerose
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The figure shows a uniformly charged thin rod of length L that has total charge Q. Find an expression for the magnitude of the electrostatic force acting on an electron positioned on the axis of the rod at a distance d from the midpoint of the rod.

http://ezto.mhecloud.mcgraw-hill.com/13252699451980596522.tp4?REQUEST=SHOWmedia&media=c21q56a.png

Homework Equations



F = \frac{kQ}{d^{2}}


The Attempt at a Solution


I know how to find the force from a point charge using the equation above, but I am not sure how to set up this problem because it is a charged thin rod. I was thinking I could divide Q by L as the charge in the above question and d-\frac{L}{2} as the d in the above equation.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you tell what is the formula for the force between two point charges q1 and q2 at a distance d from each other ? The formula you have written doesn't make much sense.
 
Tanya Sharma said:
Can you tell what is the formula for the force between two point charges q1 and q2 at a distance d from each other ? The formula you have written doesn't make much sense.

F = (k*q_{1}*q_{2})/r^{2}

Hope this is right. I suppose q1 would be the charge of the thin rod and q2 would be the charge of the point, which is e.
 
nuagerose said:
F = (k*q_{1}*q_{2})/r^{2}

Hope this is right.

Right

nuagerose said:
I suppose q1 would be the charge of the thin rod and q2 would be the charge of the point, which is e.

No.Coulomb's law applies only to point charges.You cannot apply this directly when a continuous object like a rod is present.We will have to consider rod as composed of infinitely many point charges.

Are you familiar with calculus ?You will need integration whenever a continuous charged body is present.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Back
Top