Finding the relativistic speed of a spacecraft

AI Thread Summary
A spacecraft traveling to a star 1 lightyear away takes 1 year in its own frame, prompting a calculation of its speed and the journey duration for an Earth observer. The initial calculation suggested a speed of 25% of the speed of light, but the algebra was incorrect. Upon reevaluation, the correct relationship shows that if 1 - beta^2 = beta^2, then beta equals 1/sqrt(2), indicating a more accurate speed. Consequently, the time experienced on Earth for the journey would be 2 years. The discussion highlights the importance of careful algebra in relativistic physics calculations.
insipiens
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


If a spacecraft is traveling to a star which is located at a distance of 1 lightyear and it would take the spacecraft 1 year to reach the star in its own frame, how fast would the spacecraft actually fly? Also, how long would the journey take for an observer on Earth (t_e)?
t_sc = 1 y
L_e = 1 ly
t_e = ?

Homework Equations


gamma = 1/sqrt(1-v^2/c^2)
beta = v^2/c^2
t_sc = t_e / gamma
L_sc = L_e /gamma

The Attempt at a Solution


I would start by saying that the L_e = v * t_e (v = the velocity). After throwing everything around, I get that the speed should be 25% of the speed of light, which I don't actually think is correct.
My calculations so far:
L_e = t_e * v = t_sc *v *gamma
L_e / t_sc = c = v * gamma
1/gamma^2 = beta^2
1-beta^2 = beta^2 --> beta = 1/4
Hence the time on Earth should be 4 years.
Thanks for everyone willing to help me!
Cheers,
Merlin
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi @insipiens and welcome to PF.

Your method is correct, but the algebra is not.
insipiens said:
beta = v^2/c^2
You mean beta2=v2/c2 otherwise
insipiens said:
1/gamma^2 = beta^2
would not be correct. This is a minor point. More importantly if 1-beta^2 = beta^2, what is beta2? What is beta?
 
  • Like
Likes insipiens
Thank you, you are absolutely right. I guess I was just too quick in my head and that is why I thought that sqrt(1/2)=1/4.
Now, if 1-beta^2 = beta^2, then
1/2 = beta^2 and
beta = 1/sqrt(2)
That also sounds much more reasonable. Thanks again!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top