Geometric Proof of Dot Product: |A dot B| ≤ |A||B|

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding a geometric proof for the inequality |A dot B| ≤ |A||B| in the context of vector mathematics. Participants clarify that the dot product can be represented geometrically as |A||B|cos(Φ), where cos(Φ) indicates the cosine of the angle between vectors A and B. The projection of vector B onto A is described as |B|cos(Φ), leading to the understanding that |A||B|cos(Φ) can be interpreted as the area of a rectangle formed by the projections of the vectors. The conversation emphasizes that the maximum value of cos(Φ) is 1, which supports the proof that |A dot B| cannot exceed the product of the magnitudes of A and B. Overall, the geometric interpretation aids in visualizing the relationship between the vectors and their dot product.
derekmohammed
Messages
105
Reaction score
0
I am doing a assingment for my classical mechanics class that requires the proof of:
The dot product of |A dot B| <= (less than or equeal to) |A| |B| .

I did the algebraic proof fine but we are required to do a geometic proof as well. This leaves me with the question what is the geometic view of the Dot Product?

At first I brushed it off thinking that it was a prjection of some sort, but I have no idea what |A||B|Cos(Angle) would be geometirally?

Thanks for the help
Derek
 
Physics news on Phys.org
derekmohammed said:
...

At first I brushed it off thinking that it was a prjection of some sort, but I have no idea what |A||B|Cos(Angle) would be geometirally?

Thanks for the help
Derek
|B|Cos(Angle) is the projection of B upon A.

Lat A and B be two vectors coming out from the origin. They have an angle of Φ between them.
If you draw a line from the tip of B to the vector A such that the line is perdindicular to A, and intersects it at P, say, then |B|cosΦ is the distance |OP| which is the projection of B onto A.
 
I know that |B|Cos(angle) is the projection on A but what is |A|B|Cos(angle)?
This is the question
 
|A||B|Cos(Φ) is simply the product of two scalars and is usually interpreted as two co-linear lines, |A| and |B|Cos(Φ).

Hmmm.

Can you do this ?

Let |A||B|Cos(Φ) be the product of two scalars, S1 and S2, where S1 = |A| and S2 = |B|cos(Φ).
The product of any two scalars is an area: A1 = S1*S2.

So now sketch a little rectangle with sides labelled S1 and S2.

Then |A||B| is also the product of two scalars S1 and S3, where S1 = |A| and S3 = |B|.
The product of these two scalars is A2 = S1*S3.

So now sketch another little rectangle with sides labelled S1 and S3.

Can you do something like this to (geometrically) show that A1 <= A2 ?
 
|A||B|cos (\Theta) is a scaler and represents the magnitude of the vector, the direction is that of A,
 
You want a "geometric" proof of |A dot B|<= |A||B| and you know that, geometrically, A dot B= |A||B|cos(&theta;)?

Okay how large or how small can cos(&theta;) be?
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Back
Top