Gravitational equipotential multiple choice problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a homework question related to gravitational fields and equipotential lines. The original poster struggles to understand how to determine gravitational field strength without knowing the mass's location, which affects the direction of field lines. They realize that the spacing of equipotential lines indicates the potential gradient, with closer lines suggesting greater field strength. After receiving clarification, they acknowledge the connection between equipotential lines and gravitational field strength. The conversation concludes with a mutual understanding of the concepts discussed.
Grizzly_1
Messages
7
Reaction score
3
Homework Statement
The diagram shows gravitational equipotential. Adjacent equipotential are separated by an equal gravitational potential difference V.

Which point has the greatest gravitational field strength?
Relevant Equations
E=-GM/(r^2)
Sillyquestion.jpg
Hello everyone, thank you for taking your time to read this. I was assigned a homework task of multiple choice questions to do with gravitational fields. This is one of the last questions and I have been pondering over it for some time now. I don't understand how any sort of answer is achievable.

To the best of my knowledge, gravitational field strength is directly proportional to the mass of the object that is causing the field, and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between the mass causing the field and the point at which you are determining field strength. In this case, as we do not know the location of the mass we cannot determine the direction of the field lines, and by extension we cannot tell if the potential differences are decreasing from D to A, or A to D.

If you knew which way the potential gradient was increasing, I think you could work out which point had the greatest gravitational field strength as it is the point at which potential is the least (most negative), as this implies it is closest to the mass or masses that are causing the field.

As you do not know this, I do not know how you could answer such a question, they are just arbitrarily placed about the square and I do not know the relevance of equipotentials, as these are just indications about lines that have an equal potential difference along its length, this doesn't tell us anything relevant to finding at which point the gravitational field is greatest.

So this is my reasoning so far, I am truly stumped. I hope someone can help out in solving this tricky question (or perhaps not tricky and I am just being silly).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
On a topographical map of terrain on the Earth, how can you tell the steepest parts from those that are flatter? :wink:
 
Does this help?
Screen Shot 2023-04-25 at 12.52.00 PM.png
 
kuruman said:
Does this help?
View attachment 325485
berkeman said:
On a topographical map of terrain on the Earth, how can you tell the steepest parts from those that are flatter? :wink:
Hello, thank you for responding. I understand both of your comments (I think), you are saying that, in the area were the equipotential lines are closest together, there must be a greater potential difference gradient, and therefore a greater field strength. I now understand, you have both helped me greatly. Thank you again!
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman and kuruman
Grizzly_1 said:
Hello, thank you for responding. I understand both of your comments (I think), you are saying that, in the area were the equipotential lines are closest together, there must be a greater potential difference gradient, and therefore a greater field strength. I now understand, you have both helped me greatly. Thank you again!
You got it!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top