B Gravitational Lensing: Magnification of Galaxies

Mikael17
Messages
43
Reaction score
5
TL;DR Summary
How many time does a galaxy (same size as our milkyway) magnified the background ?
How many time does a galaxy (same size as our milkyway) magnified the background ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Um...once?

This is impossible to answer. "How strong is a glass lens"?
 
It doesn't magnify at all, because it's an absolutely terrible lens. It's not even circularly symmetric, so you usually get up to four distorted and displaced copies of whatever is in the background.
 
  • Like
Likes Vanadium 50 and vanhees71
OK, how much would light then bend , when passing nearby a milkyway size galaxy ?
 
Depends how far away the light is and it depends how massive the galaxy is more than its size. There isn't really a single answer to this question.

Why are you asking? Perhaps if you have a less general question we can be more helpful.
 
Mikael17 said:
OK, how much would light then bend , when passing nearby a milkyway size galaxy ?
In Hartle's Introduction to General Relativity, he studies the deflection of light for a spherical mass in chapter 9. The estimate is ##1.7## seconds of arc for a light ray grazing the Sun. There would be less deflection for a light ray further from the Sun. In other words, it depends on the mass of the Sun and the impact parameter.

The calculation for the Milky Way would be considerably more complex, as it is not a neat spherical mass. A good project for a computer model, perhaps.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
Back
Top