I Gravity of the Sun: Einstein's Calculation and Beyond

Nik_2213
Messages
1,218
Reaction score
493
IIRC, the Sun's gravity was calculated by Einstein et-al to provide a 'focus' about 550 AU out. Current value is ~542 AU.
Aside from effects due solar oblateness, frame dragging etc, may I assume this value also applies to eg neutrinos, gravitational waves etc etc ??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes and no.

The calculation is for rays grazing the Sun, and I would expect that neutrinos and gravitational waves grazing the same surface would focus at the same distance, give or take a small bit. But gravitational lenses are terrible lenses, and the focal distance depends very much on the distance of the ray from the Sun center at perihelion. And I suspect the Sun is transparent to neutrinos for some depth below where it becomes opaque to light. And it's transparent to gravitational waves right through. So you may well be able to find focuses for them closer to the Sun.

Note that we don't have good enough neutrino or gravitational wave astronomy instruments to test anything like gravitational lensing of these things, so this is purely theoretical at this stage. We've no reason to doubt it works, but it hasn't been tested.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes topsquark, Dale and Nik_2213
I asked a question here, probably over 15 years ago on entanglement and I appreciated the thoughtful answers I received back then. The intervening years haven't made me any more knowledgeable in physics, so forgive my naïveté ! If a have a piece of paper in an area of high gravity, lets say near a black hole, and I draw a triangle on this paper and 'measure' the angles of the triangle, will they add to 180 degrees? How about if I'm looking at this paper outside of the (reasonable)...
Thread 'Relativity of simultaneity in actuality'
I’m attaching two figures from the book, Basic concepts in relativity and QT, by Resnick and Halliday. They are describing the relativity of simultaneity from a theoretical pov, which I understand. Basically, the lightning strikes at AA’ and BB’ can be deemed simultaneous either in frame S, in which case they will not be simultaneous in frame S’, and vice versa. Only in one of the frames are the two events simultaneous, but not in both, and this claim of simultaneity can be done by either of...
Back
Top