How Does a Rocket Ship Work Using Newton's Third Law?

  • Thread starter Thread starter physicsilliterate69
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rocket
AI Thread Summary
A rocket ship operates based on Newton's Third Law, which states that for every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction. It creates thrust by burning fuel and expelling exhaust gases, resulting in an imbalance of pressure that propels the rocket forward. This principle is similar to how a model rocket or a balloon works, where the release of gas pushes against the surrounding environment. The rocket's design allows for a much greater force and efficiency compared to simpler models. Understanding these basic mechanics clarifies how rockets achieve flight.
physicsilliterate69
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
We developed this as a two object system (ship and fuel/gas). How would you explain a rocket ship to someone who has seem a model rocket, bottle rocket or fireworks shot into the air and woners how that works. Did you ever blow up a balloon and just let it go?

Okay...I know that 2 objects has to do with Newtons 3rd Law as it is the only one that contains 2 objects. And I think that the gas or fire or whatever pushes against the earth. And the Earth pushes against them also. Then I'm not sure.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A rocket ship is an advanced version of a model rocket, bottle rocket, or firework. It utilizes the same basic principles that these objects use, but in a much more powerful way. A rocket ship works by creating thrust from burning a fuel and releasing it through the exhaust. This creates an imbalance of pressures between the inside and outside of the rocket, which causes the rocket to accelerate in the opposite direction of the exhaust (Newton's third law). It's like blowing up a balloon and then letting it go; the pressure of the air inside the balloon pushes against the atmosphere and propels it forward. The same concept applies to a rocket ship, with much more powerful fuel and a larger chamber that helps create a lot more thrust.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top