How Does Angular Momentum Change After a Collision in Rotational Dynamics?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the angular momentum of a rotating disk and a lump of clay after a collision. The initial angular momentum of the system must account for both the disk's rotation and the clay's linear momentum just before impact. After the clay sticks to the disk, the final angular momentum is determined by combining the moment of inertia of both masses and their velocities. Participants clarify that the angular momentum of the clay should be calculated using the cross product of its position and momentum vectors, while the disk's contribution is calculated using its moment of inertia and angular velocity. Understanding these principles is crucial for accurately solving the problem.
guitarman
Messages
22
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A rotating uniform-density disk of radius 0.7 m is mounted in the vertical plane. The axle is held up by supports that are not shown, and the disk is free to rotate on the nearly frictionless axle. The disk has mass 3.4 kg. A lump of clay with mass 0.5 kg falls and sticks to the outer edge of the wheel at the location < -0.455, 0.532, 0 > m. Just before the impact the clay has a speed 6 m/s, and the disk is rotating clockwise with angular speed 0.82 radians/s.

(a) Just before the impact, what is the angular momentum of the combined system of wheel plus clay about the center C? (As usual, x is to the right, y is up, and z is out of the screen, toward you.)
C,i = < , , > kg · m2/s
(b) Just after the impact, what is the angular momentum of the combined system of wheel plus clay about the center C?
C,f = < , , > kg · m2/s
(c) Just after the impact, what is the angular velocity of the wheel?
f = < , , > radians/s


Homework Equations



for parts a and b, I know I should be using Rcos(theta)mv
for c I should use ((Rcos(theta)mv)/((M+m)R^2)


The Attempt at a Solution



Firstly, I found that the hypotenuse was equal to 0.7,
then I did cos^-1(-0.455/0.7) and obtained that the angle is 130.542 degrees.
So for part a I plugged in 0.7 m*cos(130.542)*0.5 kg*7 m/s and obtained -1.37 kg *m^2/s, which is apparently wrong. Can someone please let me know what I am doing wrong? Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
guitarman said:
for parts a and b, I know I should be using Rcos(theta)mv
That would give you the angular momentum of the clay, but not of the system. What about the rotating disk?
 
So would I want to do Rcos(theta)*(m+M)*(v+V) so as to take into account both masses and velocities? And if so, do I convert both speeds to m/s or radians/s?
 
guitarman said:
So would I want to do Rcos(theta)*(m+M)*(v+V) so as to take into account both masses and velocities? And if so, do I convert both speeds to m/s or radians/s?

You have 2 expressions for angular momentum don't you?

You have the disk:

L = I * ω where ω is clockwise or <-z>

Then you have the angular momentum about C of the clay ball:

L = r X P

where P is the momentum vector of the clay ball <-y> and the projection of the r which is directed <-x>.
That means that this cross product is <-x> X <-y> = <z> which is counter-clockwise.

By taking the projection of the momentum to the ⊥ of the -x axis, you don't even need to use the angle. Just use the |r| as being |x|.
Of course you need to use r as .7 for figuring the I later on.

When they are combined you need to consider M and m as part of figuring the combined I.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top