How Does Sugar Inversion Impact Food Preservation Rates?

  • Thread starter Thread starter tuongcong
  • Start date Start date
tuongcong
2
0
Question:
In the process of preserving food, cane sugar is broken down(called the process of inversion) into 2 simpler sugars: glucose and fructose. In dilute solutions, The inversion rate is proportional to the concentration y(t) of unaltered sugar. If the concentrations 1/50 @ t=0 and 1/200 after 3 hrs, Find the concentrations of unaltered sugar after 6 hrs and after 12hrs.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Think of this problem as a typical half-life scenario. You can either solve it directly with the equations descriptive of half-life, or better yet, you can set up the relationship describing such a process and solve the differential equation.

Hint: the differential equation will be a linear, first order, separable equation.

tuongcong said:
Question:
In the process of preserving food, cane sugar is broken down(called the process of inversion) into 2 simpler sugars: glucose and fructose. In dilute solutions, The inversion rate is proportional to the concentration y(t) of unaltered sugar. If the concentrations 1/50 @ t=0 and 1/200 after 3 hrs, Find the concentrations of unaltered sugar after 6 hrs and after 12hrs.
 
can u be more specific plssssss.
I am totally blind on this problem.
 
Ok. I will set up the relationship for you and leave the actual solving for you.

Please see the attached Word document for the procedure.
 

Attachments

CaptainZappo said:
Ok. I will set up the relationship for you and leave the actual solving for you.

Please see the attached Word document for the procedure.

The attachment does not show enough detail to be considered posting a solution, so I approved it. Thanks for being careful to provide tutorial help only, CaptainZappo.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply . Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top