How does the electroscope lose electrons to the Earth?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the process of electron transfer in an electroscope during electrostatic induction. Initially, the top part of the electroscope becomes positively charged while the leaves gain a negative charge due to electrostatic induction. When the positively charged end is earthed, electrons flow from the Earth to neutralize the positive charge, but the excess negative charge from the leaves is expelled to the Earth, leading to a net positive charge on the electroscope. The confusion arises from the interaction between the negatively charged rod and the induced charges, as well as the potential differences that drive electron movement. Ultimately, the earthing process and the removal of the rod result in a redistribution of electrons, confirming the principles of charging by induction.
vcsharp2003
Messages
913
Reaction score
179
Homework Statement
I am trying to understand why the positively charged end when earthed would result in electron flow from postively charged end to earth. The exact steps outlined in the book are as in image below.
Relevant Equations
None
I get step 1, in which due to electrostatic induction the top part of electroscope gets positively charged while the leaves of electroscope become negatively charged.

Now if we Earth the positively charged end of electroscope as shown in step 2, then electrons must flow from Earth to positively charged end. But the book says the excess electrons from leaves flow to earth, even though positively charged end is earthed. This is confusing to me.

Perhaps, the electrons flow from Earth to positively charged end as soon as it's earthed, but then the leaves and top part end up becoming negatively charged as the electrons on the leaves redistribute to the neutral top plate and the leaves (leaves + top part form one conducting assembly). Since now the top plate is negatively charged so the electrons will flow from top plate to Earth till the leaves + plate assembly finally become neutral in charge.

CamScanner 09-20-2022 12.39.jpg
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Think of the electrons in the plate and leaves that are free to move. In step 1 they move as far away from the negatively- charged rod as possible, into the leaves. When the plate is earthed, they are repelled even farther away, into the Earth.
 
  • Like
Likes DrClaude, vcsharp2003 and hutchphd
kuruman said:
Think of the electrons in the plate and leaves that are free to move. In step 1 they move as far away from the negatively- charged rod as possible, into the leaves. When the plate is earthed, they are repelled even farther away, into the Earth.
Is the explanation that I attempted in the last paragraph of my original post not correct?
 
vcsharp2003 said:
Is the explanation that I attempted in the last paragraph of my original post not correct?
It doesn't make sense. You start by saying
vcsharp2003 said:
Perhaps, the electrons flow from Earth to positively charged end as soon as it's earthed, ##\dots##
There is also the negative charge on the rod that repels them. If you enclose the electroscope and the rod by a closed (Gaussian) surface, the total charge inside is negative. Why would the electrons from the Earth that are outside this volume be attracted to the net negative charge within the volume? It's the earthing in step 2 that expels the excess negative charge within the volume. In step 3 the Earth connection is removed prevening further exchange of electrons with the Earth. In step 4 the rod is removed to infinity and only then are the electrons redistributed on the electroscope which now has a deficit of electrons, i.e. a net positive charge. That's how charging by induction works.
 
  • Like
Likes vcsharp2003 and DrClaude
kuruman said:
It doesn't make sense. You start by saying

There is also the negative charge on the rod that repels them. If you enclose the electroscope and the rod by a closed (Gaussian) surface, the total charge inside is negative. Why would the electrons from the Earth that are outside this volume be attracted to the net negative charge within the volume? It's the earthing in step 2 that expels the excess negative charge within the volume. In step 3 the Earth connection is removed prevening further exchange of electrons with the Earth. In step 4 the rod is removed to infinity and only then are the electrons redistributed on the electroscope which now has a deficit of electrons, i.e. a net positive charge. That's how charging by induction works.
Also, we could say that due to the negatively charged rod, the plate leaf assembly will have a negative potential since this assembly is in the immediate vicinity of the negatively charged rod. Now a conductor in electrostatic equilibrium will have the same potential at all points on its surface, so all points on the plate leaf assembly are at the same potential and this potential is negative. Now, when the plate is earthed then the Earth will be at a higher potential of 0 compared to negative potential of plate. As a result, free electrons will flow from lower potential to higher potential i.e. from plate to earth.

Is above also a correct explanation of electron transfer in this case?
 
It works.
 
  • Like
Likes vcsharp2003
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...

Similar threads

Replies
37
Views
6K
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
1K
Back
Top