How Is Kinetic Energy Calculated at the Peak of a Baseball's Trajectory?

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the kinetic energy of a baseball at the peak of its trajectory, the correct approach involves using the horizontal component of the velocity, as the vertical velocity is zero at that point. The formula for kinetic energy is KE = 1/2mv^2, where the mass is 2.15 kg and the horizontal velocity is derived from the initial speed of 113 m/s multiplied by the cosine of the launch angle (11.2 degrees). After correcting the calculation, the kinetic energy at the peak is determined to be 517.866 J. The discussion emphasizes the importance of analyzing the velocity components separately to accurately assess kinetic energy at different points in the projectile's motion. Understanding these concepts is crucial for solving similar physics problems effectively.
kiwikahuna
Messages
60
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


an outfielder throws a 2.15 kg baseball at a speed of 113 m/s and an initial angle of 11.2 degrees. What is the kinetic energy of the ball at the highest point of its motion.


Homework Equations


KE = 1/2mv^2

KE(initial) + PE(initial) = KE (final) + PE (final)


The Attempt at a Solution



KE = 1/2 (2.15 kg) (113* sin 11.2)^2
KE =517.866

My method seems too simple. Should I be using the conservation of energy equation and if so, how should I go about doing it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Almost right - have a look at you sine/cosine.

You know that you can consider the velocity components in the horizontal and vertical directions independently. What are the forces acting along each direction of the velocity components? When the ball is at its highest point, what can you say about the ball's vertical velocity? And what about the horizontal velocity?

As I say, you've almost got it right, just look at splitting the velocity into components again. :smile:
 
when the ball is at its highest point, the ball's vertical velocity would be zero? Should I have used: KE = 1/2 (2.15 kg) (113* cos 11.2)^2 instead?
 
That is correct.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top