How is thermal energy affected by friction on an inclined plane?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the increase in thermal energy of a crate being pulled up an incline, emphasizing the role of friction and the normal force. The initial attempt to calculate thermal energy using friction alone yielded an incorrect result, prompting a reevaluation of the forces at play. Participants highlighted the importance of considering the tension in the rope, which affects the normal force and consequently the frictional force. The correct approach involves accounting for both the gravitational force and the tension's vertical component to accurately determine the work done by friction. Ultimately, understanding the interplay between these forces is crucial for solving the problem correctly.
mystic3
5
0

Homework Statement



An 8.5 kg crate is pulled 5.5 m up a 30degree incline by a rope angled 16degree above the incline. The tension in the rope is 140 N and the crate's coefficient of kinetic friction on the incline is 0.26. What is the increase in thermal energy of the crate and the incline?

Homework Equations



F = mg
W = Fdcos(theta)

The Attempt at a Solution



I figured, thermal energy could only come from friction so I calculated the work done by friction.

N = mgcos(30)

Ff = uN
= umgcos(30)

W = umgcos(30)d
= (0.26)(8.5)(9.8)cos(30)(5.5)
= 103J

but it's wrong!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mystic3 said:

Homework Statement



An 8.5 kg crate is pulled 5.5 m up a 30degree incline by a rope angled 16degree above the incline. The tension in the rope is 140 N and the crate's coefficient of kinetic friction on the incline is 0.26. What is the increase in thermal energy of the crate and the incline?

Homework Equations



F = mg
W = Fdcos(theta)

The Attempt at a Solution



I figured, thermal energy could only come from friction so I calculated the work done by friction.

N = mgcos(30)

Ff = uN
= umgcos(30)

W = umgcos(30)d
= (0.26)(8.5)(9.8)cos(30)(5.5)
= 103J

but it's wrong!

Welcome to PF.

What about the component of the pulling force that was 16 degrees above the slope that lightened the normal force of the crate?
 
I'm not 100% if I'm approaching the question properly but I got the right answer. o.O

basically I have normal force, and then the lifting force which is the y-component of the force of tension. so...

W = F*u*d
=(n - Ty)(u)(d)
=(mgcosθ1 - Tsinθ2)(u)(d) *θ1 = 30, θ2 = 16
=(8.5*9.8*cos30 - 140*sin16)(0.26)(5.5)
=47.9 ~ 48J

It's the right answer, but normal force (n) and the y-component of Tension (Ty) is going in the same direction, so I should be adding them instead, but then I won't get the right answer. Can someone tell me what I'm doing wrong?
 
mystic3 said:
I'm not 100% if I'm approaching the question properly but I got the right answer. o.O

basically I have normal force, and then the lifting force which is the y-component of the force of tension. so...

W = F*u*d
=(n - Ty)(u)(d)
=(mgcosθ1 - Tsinθ2)(u)(d) *θ1 = 30, θ2 = 16
=(8.5*9.8*cos30 - 140*sin16)(0.26)(5.5)
=47.9 ~ 48J

It's the right answer, but normal force (n) and the y-component of Tension (Ty) is going in the same direction, so I should be adding them instead, but then I won't get the right answer. Can someone tell me what I'm doing wrong?

When you calculate Work you calculate it along the direction of it's motion. F * D. The Normal force per se is doing no work on the crate as it is not in the direction of its motion.. What is doing work in the direction of its motion is the frictional resistance that is retarding its motion. Now the retarding effect of friction depends on the normal force as it is related by the coefficient of friction. And the normal force is made up of the m*g component into the incline less (in this case) the Tension component of the rope that is pulling in the upward direction. (If someone was pushing down at an angle on the crate then the normal component of that would be added to the normal m*g component.)
 
I think I got the idea. The lifting force of the y-component of Tension counteracts the force of Gravity and reduces it's magnitude, and because the Normal force depends on the Fg, it will also be reduced. But, I'm still not sure how I could show this on paper.
 
mystic3 said:
I think I got the idea. The lifting force of the y-component of Tension counteracts the force of Gravity and reduces it's magnitude, and because the Normal force depends on the Fg, it will also be reduced. But, I'm still not sure how I could show this on paper.

The Force you are concerned with for work is the Force vector down the plane that has the magnitude = u*(m*g*Cosθ - T*sin16) and of course your m*g*Sinθ force too. You can draw in the other normal forces for reference, but you should draw and label Friction. Your math should demonstrate that you understand what it is made up of.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top