How to derive the coefficient of thermal expansion?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the relationship between Young's Modulus and the coefficient of linear thermal expansion, highlighting their inverse proportionality. It begins by explaining how to calculate strain from thermal expansion using basic principles and formulas. The derivation involves substituting the change in length due to thermal expansion into the Young's Modulus equation. The final conclusion is that Young's Modulus is inversely proportional to the coefficient of linear thermal expansion, confirming the initial claim. A solid understanding of the relevant formulas is essential for this derivation.
tony_engin
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
Hi!
How to relate the Young's Modulus with the coefficient of linear thermal expansion? It is known that they are inversely proportional to each other, but how to prove this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello,

It can be derived from basic principles. You can start by finding the strain caused by
the thermal expansion. The change in length for this part can be found by subbing in the thermal expansion formuale. Hence we have found the strain.

Y=stress/strain
=Fl/A(dl) where dl= change in length
I cannot proceed further than this due to lack of information on which kind of shape it have. ( to calculate A) However, the coefficient of thermal expansion could be seen to be inversely proportional to Y after subbing in the expression for dl.
 
Ok...For this you need to have a good grip on basic formulae

Since you are dealing with linear Young's modulus.First of all Young's Modulus for a wire of a specific material is given by:

Y= \frac{FL}{A (dL)}

where dL=Change in Length

Now change is length due to linear expansion is given by:

dL=L (a) (dT)

a=coefficient of linear expansion
dT=Change in Temperature

Now putting the values in Young's modulus equation:

Y= \frac{F}{A (a) (dT)}

Therefore Y is inversely proportional to a...easy isn't it?
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Back
Top