How to express ωₙ in terms of only mass (m) and stiffness (k)?

AI Thread Summary
To express the natural frequency ωₙ in terms of mass (m) and stiffness (k), one approach involves using Newton's laws and free body diagrams for each mass in a pulley system. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding the initial displacement, denoted as δₛₜ, and how it relates to the system's dynamics. A simpler method suggested is to utilize energy methods by introducing a generalized coordinate x to derive kinetic and potential energies. The natural frequency can be determined from the total energy equation, leading to the relationship ω² = k/μ, where μ represents the effective mass. Ultimately, both force equations and energy conservation can be employed to derive the desired expression for ωₙ.
Rae
Messages
2
Reaction score
2
Summary: How to express ωₙ in terms of only mass (m) and stiffness (k)? I tried doing it with F=kx but it is out of my ability to simplify it to only m and k.

Screenshot 2022-05-17 155003.png


Here is my approach:
Screenshot 2022-05-17 175502.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Tell me what is ##\delta_{st}##?
You need (a free body diagram and) Newton's law for each mass, and the constraint on the positions (and hence accelerations) engendered by the pulley system.
 
hutchphd said:
Tell me what is ##\delta_{st}##?
You need (a free body diagram and) Newton's law for each mass, and the constraint on the positions (and hence accelerations) engendered by the pulley system.
From what i was taught in my lecture classes, ##\delta_{st}## means the initial displacement that the spring has before we displace it further by x. I am not sure if it is needed in this case.

Is my free body diagram correct for the 2 identical masses?
Screenshot 2022-05-17 194156.png
 
Although you can solve this by finding the force equations and considering the tension in the string etc, there is a much simpler way by using energy methods if you can manage to introduce a generalised coordinate ##x## that describes the position of the system and write down the kinetic and potential energies as depending on ##x##. Generally, if the total energy is on the form ##E = (\mu \dot x^2 + k (x-a)^2)/2 + C##, where ##C##, ##\mu##, ##k##, and ##a## are constants, then the natural frequency is given by ##\omega^2 = k/\mu##.
 
Good. Write Newton's Law for body 1 and for body 2 (along the direction of travel for each). Eliminate T. Use constraint to eliminate coordinate 1 (or 2 if you prefer). Choose ##\delta_{st}## to give the correct static limit.
This should now look like an oscillator diff. equation.
Perhaps you can use energy conservation to get to the same answer more easilly, but you should be able to do either, I reckon.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top