How to Find Intervals for α and β in a Linear Model Given y and x?

AI Thread Summary
In a simple linear model defined by the equation α + β × x = y, the discussion revolves around determining the intervals for α and β given the observed range of y, specifically when x = 4 and y ∈ (-8.51, 23.20). The problem is deemed not well-defined since α and β are interdependent, allowing for multiple combinations that satisfy the equation. To establish unique intervals for α and β, an additional relationship or constraint is necessary. Without this, the problem remains ambiguous and lacks a definitive solution. The need for further information to refine the model is emphasized.
zli034
Messages
106
Reaction score
0
For a simple linear model:
\alpha+\beta\times x=y

If it is observed that y \in (-8.51,23.20) given x=4

The question is to give intervals of \alpha, \beta, which satisfy y \in (-8.51,23.20) given x=4.

Is this problem identifiable? Can it be found the unique intervals for \alpha, \beta?

I am guessing this is not a well defined problem. How to improve on this?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
α and β are connected by a linear equation. This means the you can give any value for one variable and get an interval for the other. To improve you need another relation.
 
Hello, I'm joining this forum to ask two questions which have nagged me for some time. They both are presumed obvious, yet don't make sense to me. Nobody will explain their positions, which is...uh...aka science. I also have a thread for the other question. But this one involves probability, known as the Monty Hall Problem. Please see any number of YouTube videos on this for an explanation, I'll leave it to them to explain it. I question the predicate of all those who answer this...
I'm taking a look at intuitionistic propositional logic (IPL). Basically it exclude Double Negation Elimination (DNE) from the set of axiom schemas replacing it with Ex falso quodlibet: ⊥ → p for any proposition p (including both atomic and composite propositions). In IPL, for instance, the Law of Excluded Middle (LEM) p ∨ ¬p is no longer a theorem. My question: aside from the logic formal perspective, is IPL supposed to model/address some specific "kind of world" ? Thanks.
I was reading a Bachelor thesis on Peano Arithmetic (PA). PA has the following axioms (not including the induction schema): $$\begin{align} & (A1) ~~~~ \forall x \neg (x + 1 = 0) \nonumber \\ & (A2) ~~~~ \forall xy (x + 1 =y + 1 \to x = y) \nonumber \\ & (A3) ~~~~ \forall x (x + 0 = x) \nonumber \\ & (A4) ~~~~ \forall xy (x + (y +1) = (x + y ) + 1) \nonumber \\ & (A5) ~~~~ \forall x (x \cdot 0 = 0) \nonumber \\ & (A6) ~~~~ \forall xy (x \cdot (y + 1) = (x \cdot y) + x) \nonumber...
Back
Top