How to solve a differential equation for a mass-spring oscillator?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on solving a differential equation for a mass-spring oscillator affected by friction. The derived equation incorporates spring force and friction, leading to a complex form that includes the hyperbolic tangent function. Participants express uncertainty about solving it analytically due to the velocity term in the friction equation, suggesting that a small amplitude approximation may be necessary. The conversation highlights the need for numerical values for parameters like stiffness, friction coefficient, and mass to proceed further. Ultimately, the consensus leans towards numerical methods as the likely solution approach.
bolzano95
Messages
89
Reaction score
7
Homework Statement
There is an mass-spring oscillator made of a spring with stiffness k and a block of mass m. The block is affected by a friction.
At the time ##t=0s## the block is pulled from the equilibrium position for ##x=5cm## in the right direction and released.
Derive and solve the equation for a displacement x, velocity v and power P.
Relevant Equations
II. Newton's Law
There is an mass-spring oscillator made of a spring with stiffness k and a block of mass m. The block is affected by a friction given by the equation:
$$F_f = -k_f N tanh(\frac{v}{v_c})$$
##k_f## - friction coefficient
N - normal force
##v_c## - velocity tolerance.

At the time ##t=0s## the block is pulled from the equilibrium position for ##x=5cm## in the right direction and released.
1. Derive the differential equation.
2. Solve it for a displacement x.
3. Solve it for a velocity v.
4. Solve it for the power loss P, because of the friction.

image1.png

1. Deriving the necessary equation:
In the vertical direction: N=mg.
Because the only forces acting on the block in horizontal direction are the spring force and friction we can write:
$$-kx + k_f\, N\, tanh(\frac{\dot{x}}{v_c})=m\ddot{x}$$
$$m\ddot{x} - k_f\: mg\: tanh(\frac{\dot{x}}{v_c}) +kx=0$$

Here my solving stops, because I'm not sure how to implement the standard solution ##x(t)= Ce^{\lambda t}## because velocity is inside the function ##tanh(\frac{\dot{x}}{v_c})##.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are given a numerical value for the initial displacement. Are you given numerical values for any of the other parameters such as ##k, k_f, v_c## and ##m##?

At first glance, the differential equation looks difficult to solve unless you can make a small amplitude approximation such that ##\dot x## is always much less than ##v_c##.
 
TSny said:
You are given a numerical value for the initial displacement. Are you given numerical values for any of the other parameters such as ##k, k_f, v_c## and ##m##?

At first glance, the differential equation looks difficult to solve unless you can make a small amplitude approximation such that ##\dot x## is always much less than ##v_c##.
Oh yes, the initial conditions and parameters of the system given.

So there is no chance of solving this analytically, only numerically?
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top