I am confused by the concept of space-time in special relativity

AI Thread Summary
Space-time in special relativity combines three spatial dimensions with one time dimension, creating a unified framework known as Minkowski spacetime. In contrast, Newtonian physics operates with Galilean spacetime, where space and time are treated as separate entities, leading to less frequent references to the term "spacetime." The intertwining of space and time in special relativity reflects the effects of relative motion on measurements of time and distance. This distinction clarifies why "spacetime" is more commonly associated with Einstein's theories rather than Newton's. Understanding these differences is essential for grasping the implications of relativity.
rgtr
Messages
90
Reaction score
8
Homework Statement
I am confused by the concept of space-time in special relativity, I have 3 spatial dimensions and 1 time dimensions. In Newtonian physics don't I also have 3 spatial dimensions and 1 time dimension? Then why call it space time in special relativity and not in Newtonian physics?
Relevant Equations
No equations
I am confused by the concept of space-time in special relativity, I have 3 spatial dimensions and 1 time dimensions. In Newtonian physics don't I also have 3 spatial dimensions and 1 time dimension? Then why call it space time in special relativity and not in Newtonian physics?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is called spacetime in Newtonian physics too.

The difference is that Newtonian physics has Galilean spacetime where space and time are much less intertwined than in the Minkowski spacetime of special relativity or the general Lorentzian manifolds of general relativity. It istherefore much less common to talk about spacetime in Newtonian physics.
 
Thanks.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top