Invariant Spacetime Interval for Classical Spacetime

AcidRainLiTE
Messages
89
Reaction score
2
In special relativity we have the invariant spacetime interval ds2 = dx2 - c2dt2. If we think about classical (non-relativistic) space and time as one spacetime in which the transformation between reference frames is given by the Galilean transformation, is there a corresponding spacetime interval that is invariant (the same when computed in any reference frame)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
AcidRainLiTE said:
If we think about classical (non-relativistic) space and time as one spacetime in which the transformation between reference frames is given by the Galilean transformation, is there a corresponding spacetime interval that is invariant (the same when computed in any reference frame)?

No. There can't be, because the Galilean transformation leaves the time coordinate unchanged but changes the space coordinates. In other words, a Galilean transformation can change ##dx^2## between two given events, but always leaves ##dt^2## unchanged.
 
So then is it not possible to think of classical space and time as a single spacetime since we cannot assign a definite meaning to the distance between spacetime points (independent of reference frames)?
 
AcidRainLiTE said:
So then is it not possible to think of classical space and time as a single spacetime since we cannot assign a definite meaning to the distance between spacetime points (independent of reference frames)?

Actually it is possible and there is a lot of literature on the geometrization of Newtonian gravity and Galilean relativity. The difference is that instead of a single space-time metric, one has a time metric and a spatial metric which are separate from one another.

EDIT: And the reason for this is that Galilean relativity offers an absolute global time function that foliates space-time by the same simultaneity planes for all inertial observers whereas in SR the simultaneity planes foliating space-time are relativized to inertial observers.
 
Last edited:
WannabeNewton said:
The difference is that instead of a single space-time metric, one has a time metric and a spatial metric which are separate from one another.

So while there is some notion of distance in classical spacetime, you cannot speak of a distance between two arbitrary spacetime points, right? You can only speak of the distance between points on the same time slice (this would be the spatial metric) or points at the same position slice (this would be the time-metric). You cannot speak of the distance of points on different time slices at different positions. Is this correct?
 
I asked a question here, probably over 15 years ago on entanglement and I appreciated the thoughtful answers I received back then. The intervening years haven't made me any more knowledgeable in physics, so forgive my naïveté ! If a have a piece of paper in an area of high gravity, lets say near a black hole, and I draw a triangle on this paper and 'measure' the angles of the triangle, will they add to 180 degrees? How about if I'm looking at this paper outside of the (reasonable)...
Thread 'Relativity of simultaneity in actuality'
I’m attaching two figures from the book, Basic concepts in relativity and QT, by Resnick and Halliday. They are describing the relativity of simultaneity from a theoretical pov, which I understand. Basically, the lightning strikes at AA’ and BB’ can be deemed simultaneous either in frame S, in which case they will not be simultaneous in frame S’, and vice versa. Only in one of the frames are the two events simultaneous, but not in both, and this claim of simultaneity can be done by either of...
Back
Top