Is Over 100% Solidity Normal for Wind Turbine Blades Near the Hub?

AI Thread Summary
Calculating turbine design parameters reveals that a solidity exceeding 100% near the hub is not typical, especially for a 6-bladed turbine, which is also unconventional. Most modern horizontal axis wind turbines (HAWTs) have a solidity of around 10% or less, with a 6-bladed design resulting in higher solidity values. The equations provided for calculating tip speed ratio and local chord length are correct, but hand calculations are recommended to verify results. Expected solidity values should range from approximately 7% to 30%, depending on design specifics. It's essential to consider the relationship between solidity and tip speed ratio for optimal turbine efficiency.
fugg
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Hello. I'm calculating the different parameters of a turbine design but I have some trouble with the solidity. The solidity near the hub exceeds 100%, but is an average of ~27% for a 6 bladed turbine. I'm just wondering if anyone has had experience in turbine design and if +100% solidity is normal (i.e. normal for blades to overlap each other near hub) or not. Any help would be much appreciated.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I have a little experience in wind turbine design, and no a solidity of greater than 100% is not normal. A wind turbine with 6 blades isn't normal either. Solidity over 10% of the entire turbine is relatively uncommon for most modern HAWTs.
 
As the blade count increases, the solidity naturally does too. Sorry it wasn't 27% I was thinking of a different figure, but ~12%, which given that a 3 blade turbine would be ~9% seems reasonable. A 6 bladed turbine is indeed not conventional, but noise and tip speed ratio are my priorities hence the blade count.
I'm attaching an Excel sheet detailing the calculations. Am I missing something very obvious? The following equations were used:

Tip Speed Ratio: λ= ΩR/U, at distance r: λ_r=λ r/R
Angle of relative wind: φ= 2/3 〖tan〗^(-1) 1/λ_r
Local cord length: cl= (8πr/(BC_l ))(1-cosφ)
Optimum solidity for B blade number: σ≅ B/Nπ (N∑(i=1)(cl/R))

N=number of blade sections, 10 in this case.
Doesn't copy very well but you get the idea. I assumed the Coefficient of lift (Cl) to be 1 across the span to make it simple though I don't think it's too much of a stretch?
 

Attachments

Aww, no one has worked in wind turbine design?
 
The equations you have listed are correct. It is easy to check your work, just do a few hand calculations to confirm the equations have been properly entered.

As for the results you should get solidity between ~7% (although single blade designs are even less) and ~30%. To check a specific turbine make sure that in the case of a high solidity the tip speed ratio is low and for low solidity the tip speed ratio is high. There are equations for finding the most efficient ratio, but not all turbines are efficient so use this as a guideline and not a rule. To make this simple I have attached a graph of solidity vs tip speed ratio.



www.charlieseviour.co.uk
 

Attachments

  • tsr_vs_solidity.jpg
    tsr_vs_solidity.jpg
    24.3 KB · Views: 780
Here's a video by “driving 4 answers” who seems to me to be well versed on the details of Internal Combustion engines. The video does cover something that's a bit shrouded in 'conspiracy theory', and he touches on that, but of course for phys.org, I'm only interested in the actual science involved. He analyzes the claim of achieving 100 mpg with a 427 cubic inch V8 1970 Ford Galaxy in 1977. Only the fuel supply system was modified. I was surprised that he feels the claim could have been...
TL;DR Summary: Heard in the news about using sonar to locate the sub Hello : After the sinking of the ship near the Greek shores , carrying of alot of people , there was another accident that include 5 tourists and a submarine visiting the titanic , which went missing Some technical notes captured my attention, that there us few sonar devices are hearing sounds repeated every 30 seconds , but they are not able to locate the source Is it possible that the sound waves are reflecting from...
Back
Top