Kinematics: two runners with different and non-constant accelerations

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the kinematics of two runners, A and B, with different non-constant accelerations. Calculations show that runner A reaches 100 meters in approximately 14.6 seconds, while runner B takes about 14.9 seconds, indicating A is faster. Both runners cover 40 meters in 5 seconds but must run the subsequent 60 meters at a higher average speed than the first segment. There is a critique regarding the calculation of accelerations for both runners, suggesting that the time variables were not correctly applied in the velocity equations. Overall, the analysis highlights discrepancies in the initial calculations of acceleration and time taken to complete the race distance.
lorenz0
Messages
151
Reaction score
28
Homework Statement
In a 100m race, two runners run the first 40m both in ##t_1=5s##. Runner A runs with a constant and maximal acceleration ##a_A## for the first ##2.8s## and then runs at constant speed ##v_A##. The second runner B runs at a constant and maximal acceleration ##a_B## for the first ##3.2s## and then he also runs at a constant speed ##v_B##. Determine:
1) who wins the race and the time he takes to do so;
2) how much time runner B would take to run the 100m if, after having achieved the maximum speed ##v_B##, started decelerating with ##a=-kv##, where ##k=0.05 s^{-1}##
Relevant Equations
##x(t)=x_0+v_0 t+\frac{1}{2}at^2, v(t)=v_0+at, a=\frac{dv}{dt}, v=\frac{dx}{dt}##
1. $$x_{A}(t)=\begin{cases}\frac{1}{2}a_A t^2 & 0\leq t\leq 2.8\\ \frac{1}{2}a_A 2.8^2 +v_A t & t>2.8\end{cases}=\begin{cases}\frac{1}{2}a_A t^2 & 0\leq t\leq 2.8\\ \frac{1}{2}a_A 2.8^2 +a_A\cdot 2.8\cdot t & t>2.8\end{cases}$$ so ##x_A(5)=40## implies ##a_A=\frac{40}{17.92}m/s##. Similarly for B we have $$x_{B}(t)=\begin{cases}\frac{1}{2}a_B t^2 & 0\leq t\leq 3.2\\ \frac{1}{2}a_B 3.2^2 +v_B t & t>3.2\end{cases}=\begin{cases}\frac{1}{2}a_B t^2 & 0\leq t\leq 3.2\\ \frac{1}{2}a_B 3.2^2 +a_B\cdot 3.2\cdot t & t>3.2\end{cases}$$ so ##x_B(5)=40## implies ##a_B=\frac{40}{21.12}m/s##. Thus the time ##t_{100A}## that it takes for A to reach 100 m is $$100=\frac{1}{2}a_A 2.8^2 +a_A\cdot 2.8\cdot t_{100A}\Rightarrow t_{100A}=\frac{1}{2}(\frac{200}{2.8 a_A}-2.8)=14.6s$$. Similarly, the time ##t_{100B}## that it takes for B to reach 100m is $$100=\frac{1}{2}a_B\cdot 3.2^2+a_B\cdot 3.2\cdot t_{100B}\Rightarrow t_{100B}=\frac{1}{2}(\frac{200}{3.2a_B}-3.2)=14.9s$$ so A reaches the 100m before B does.

2. $$a=\frac{dv}{dt}=-kv\Rightarrow \frac{dv}{v}=-kdt\Rightarrow \int_{v_B}^{v(t)}\frac{dv'}{v'}=-k\int_{3.2}^{t}dt' \Rightarrow v(t)=v_B e^{3.2k-kt}=\frac{dx}{dt}\Rightarrow \int_{40}^{100}dx=\int_{3.2}^{t_{100}}v_B e^{3.2k-kt}dt\Rightarrow 60=a_B\cdot 3.2e^{3.2k}\int_{3.2}^{t_{100}}e^{-kt}dt\Rightarrow t_{100}=-20\cdot\ln(\frac{101}{200}e^{-\frac{3.2}{20}})\approx 16.864 s$$
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
They both run 40m in 5s. They must run the second 60m at a greater average speed than the first 40m. Therefore, both should take less than 12.5s, and not nearly 15s.

Your answers to 1) can't be right.
 
##a_A## and ##a_B## didn't come out right because you didn't use ##t_v=5-t_a## in the ##v## terms
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Back
Top