Lumped capacitance model if you insure the interior is well mixed?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the applicability of the lumped capacitance model for heat loss calculations in a sealed cube filled with hot water, which is stirred to maintain uniform temperature. The main concern is determining the appropriate heat transfer coefficient to use for calculating the Biot number, essential for validating the model. The user seeks guidance on whether Newton's law of cooling can be applied under these conditions and how to accurately calculate the Biot number. They also mention adjusting for heat input from the stirrer. Overall, the inquiry emphasizes the need for clarity in applying thermal models to experimental setups.
smithy360
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hi everybody. I have been doing some experimental heat loss calculations on a sealed cube of fluid, filling the volume of the cube with hot water then sitting it in a larger tank of fluid at a fixed cooler temperature and monitoring the drop of temperature inside the box. I have also positioned a stirrer inside the cube to maintain a uniform temperature within.

I am struggling to verify if the lumped capacitance model is applicable in terms of Biot number, I don't know what would be best to take as the value for the heat transfer coefficient in this situation. Will Newton's law of cooling be okay to apply given I am insuring that the temperature within the cube stays uniform at all times? The values I get from the calculations certainly seem in line with what I would expect, I just want to be able to justify it. (I should also say I am adjusting for the slight heat flux put into the system from the stirrer).

Any tips would be helpful, or even some guidance on how to calculate the Biot number in this setup would be great.

Kind regards.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Does anybody have any suggestions on how to calculate the Biot number in this setup as a starting point?

Many thanks again.
 
I have Mass A being pulled vertically. I have Mass B on an incline that is pulling Mass A. There is a 2:1 pulley between them. The math I'm using is: FA = MA / 2 = ? t-force MB * SIN(of the incline degree) = ? If MB is greater then FA, it pulls FA up as MB moves down the incline. BUT... If I reverse the 2:1 pulley. Then the math changes to... FA = MA * 2 = ? t-force MB * SIN(of the incline degree) = ? If FA is greater then MB, it pulls MB up the incline as FA moves down. It's confusing...
Hi. I noticed that all electronic devices in my household that also tell time eventually lag behind, except the ones that get synchronized by radio signal or internet. Most of them are battery-powered, except my alarm clock (which runs slow as well). Why does none of them run too fast? Deliberate design (why)? Wrong temperature for quartz crystal? Decreasing battery voltage? Or just a coincidence?
Back
Top