How Many Forces Can You Add to Keep an Object in Equilibrium?

  • Thread starter Thread starter nuclearrape66
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Equilibrium Force
Click For Summary
An object can theoretically be in equilibrium with an infinite number of forces acting on it, as long as the net force in both horizontal and vertical components remains zero. For instance, two equal and opposite forces can keep an object stationary, demonstrating equilibrium. However, practical limitations exist, as real-world conditions may prevent an infinite number of forces from being applied effectively. The discussion also touches on the concept of calculus, suggesting that while infinite forces could be considered, they may not always yield infinite results in practical scenarios. Ultimately, while the idea of infinite forces is intriguing, it is constrained by physical realities.
nuclearrape66
Messages
31
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


how mnay forces can you add to kep an object in equilibrium


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



is it infinite? and what would be the reason? It doesn't seem realistically possible??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Equilibrium means that the net force in both the horizontal and vertical compenents is 0.
 
so are you saying that there can be an infinite amount of forces acting on an object sp that it's at equilibrium?
 
If the object can handle an infinite amount of forces, than yes.

For example, there are 2 forces acting on an object horizontaly. One force is x N to the right, the other force is x N to the left, hence the net force in the horizontal component is 0, assuming there are no other forces acting upon it, it would not move, and be in equalibriam.
 
I'm thinking that ideally it would be infinite...but I'm somehow sure there are limitations...using calculus, one could show that infinite may not always lead to infinite. For example, if one were to cross a river, one would have to cross an infinite number of infinitesimal steps...but there is apparently some limited distance to it.
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K