Meri go round: Angular momentum

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the new angular velocity of a rotating meri go round after four men enter. The initial moment of inertia is given as 1750 kg m² with an angular velocity of 0.70 rad/s. The correct approach to find the new moment of inertia includes adding the contributions from the four men, treated as point masses at the edge. The calculation shows that the new moment of inertia should be 1750 kg m² plus the additional inertia from the men, leading to a new angular velocity of approximately 0.004 rad/s. The importance of correctly applying the moment of inertia formula for point masses is emphasized in the solution.
kalupahana
Messages
31
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A meri go round is rotating it vertical axis through center with a diameter 4.5m. It's moment of inertia is 1750 kg m2 and angular velocity is 0.70 rad/s. 4 men with mass 65 kg instantly enter the the edge of the meri go round. Calculate the angular velocity of meri go round after that instant.

Homework Equations


Conservation of angular momentum
I1ω1 = I2ω2

I = ma2

The Attempt at a Solution


I1 = 1750 kg m2
ω1 = 0.70 rad/s

The mass of meri go round
1750 = ma2
1750 = m(4.5/2)2
(1750 x 4)/ (4.5)2 = m

The mass of meri go round after 4 men get in

m = (1750 x 4)/ (4.5)2 + 65 x 4
m = [7000 + (260 x (4.5)2]/(4.5)2
m = 12265/(4.5)2

Then
I2 = 12265 kg m2

Applying conservation of angular momentum

1750 x 0.70 = 12265 ω2
ω2 = 1.099 rad/sBut the answer is given as 0.004 rad/s.
Please help me to reach to this answer
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The mistake you've made is 'I=ma^2' which is only valid for a point particle.
The ride could be any complex shape you can't say anything about.

So moment of inertia after 4 men go on is: 1750 + 4*(65)*((4.5/2)^2)

the men are assumed to be point masses at a distance a/2 so their moments of inertia is m(a/2)^2 each.
This can be just added to the moment of inertia of the ride, as the axis of rotation stays same throughout the problem.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top