Modification of Wheatstone Bridge

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the total resistance of a modified Wheatstone Bridge when R2 is replaced with an ideal wire. Participants agree that R1 and R3 will be in parallel, forming R6, which is then in series with R4 to create R7. R7 is ultimately in parallel with R5. A key point of contention arises regarding the impact of replacing both R1 and R2 with ideal wires, leading to the conclusion that R3 becomes irrelevant, leaving R4 and R5 in parallel. The conversation concludes with appreciation for the clarification provided.
songoku
Messages
2,485
Reaction score
393
Homework Statement
This is not homework, the question just crossed my mind when I was reviewing about Wheatstone bridge. Please see the picture below
Relevant Equations
Series and Parallel circuit
1622590517073.png


I want to ask what the total resistance of the circuit will be if R2 is removed and being replaced with ideal wire.

I think R1 and R3 will be parallel → let this be R6

R6 will be series with R4 → let this be R7

Then R7 will be parallel to R5

Is that correct? Thanks
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2 and Charles Link
Physics news on Phys.org
I also think you are correct.
 
  • Like
Likes Charles Link
If both R1 and R2 are replaced by ideal wire, would I need to use Delta - star transformation?

Something like this:
1622621474247.png


where:
$$R_A=\frac{R_3 \times R_4}{R_3+R_4+R_5}$$
$$R_B=\frac{R_3 \times R_5}{R_3+R_4+R_5}$$
$$R_C=\frac{R_4 \times R_5}{R_3+R_4+R_5}$$

After that, ##R_A## will be parallel to ##R_B## and the result will be series with ##R_C##

Is that correct? Thanks
 
No I don't think that's correct , if ##R_1## and ##R_2## are replaced by ideal wires then we shall have ##V_D=V_A=V_B## which means that effectively ##R_3## will also be out of the game. So you ll just have ##R_4## and ##R_5## in parallel. That's what I think.
 
Delta2 said:
No I don't think that's correct , if ##R_1## and ##R_2## are replaced by ideal wires then we shall have ##V_D=V_A=V_B## which means that effectively ##R_3## will also be out of the game. So you ll just have ##R_4## and ##R_5## in parallel. That's what I think.
Ah I see

Thank you very much for the help and explanation Charles Link and Delta2
 
  • Like
Likes Charles Link
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...

Similar threads

Back
Top