Moment of Inertia of this combined system?

AI Thread Summary
The moment of inertia for a rod rotated around one end is calculated as 1/3ML^2, while for a sphere it is 2/5MR^2. The total moment of inertia for the combined system should include an additional ML^2 term due to the need to apply the parallel axis theorem correctly. This theorem requires both objects' axes to be shifted to the same point, which was not done for the sphere in the initial calculation. The axis of rotation is perpendicular to the rod and located at the end opposite the sphere, confirming the need for this adjustment.
jaewonjung
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
A rigid rod of mass M and length L has moment of inertia 1/12 ML^2 about its center of mass. A sphere of mass m and radius R has moment of inertia 2/5 MR^2 about its center of mass. A combined system is formed by centering the sphere at one end of the rod and placing an axis at the other.


What is the moment of inertia of the combined system?
Relevant Equations
SumI=I1+I2+I3...
I=MR^2
Moment of inertia for a rod rotated around one end is 1/3ML^2 using the parallel axis theorem
Moment of inertia for a sphere is 2/5 MR^2

Itotal=Isphere+Irod=2/5MR^2+1/3ML^2

However, the answer is 2/5MR^2+1/3ML^2+ML^2

Why is there an extra ML^2 added to the moment of inertia?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jaewonjung said:
Moment of inertia for a rod rotated around one end is 1/3ML^2 using the parallel axis theorem
Moment of inertia for a sphere is 2/5 MR^2

Itotal=Isphere+Irod=2/5MR^2+1/3ML^2

However, the answer is 2/5MR^2+1/3ML^2+ML^2

Why is there an extra ML^2 added to the moment of inertia?

So you need to use the parallel axis theorem properly here. When you have compound systems, you need to shift both of their axes to the same point. You have done so for the rod, but not for the sphere. That moment of inertia is still through the centre of the sphere.

Also, always best to shift both separately to the same point and then add, rather than vice versa.

Hope that helps.
 
Master1022 said:
Just for my understanding, which is the direction of the axis? Just to confirm that it is out of the plane of the rod?
Sorry for not including a picture. The axis is perpendicular to the rod, and is placed at the end of the rod that doesn't have the sphere attached to it.
 
Master1022 said:
So you need to use the parallel axis theorem properly here. When you have compound systems, you need to shift both of their axes to the same point. You have done so for the rod, but not for the sphere. That moment of inertia is still through the centre of the sphere.

Also, always best to shift both separately to the same point and then add, rather than vice versa.

Hope that helps.
I see. shifting the axis from the center of the sphere to the other end of the rod is ML^2.
Thanks!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top