Network Analysis, Kirchhoff's Laws, changing current source to voltage

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on applying Kirchhoff's laws to analyze a circuit with a current source. The original poster is unsure about including the current source in their loop equations and whether to convert it to a voltage source. Key points emphasize the importance of correctly identifying nodes and branches in the circuit, as well as ensuring all linearly independent equations are included. It is clarified that the current source should be included in the loop for Kirchhoff's Voltage Law (KVL) and that careful attention must be paid to definitions and polarities in the equations. Ultimately, the poster successfully resolved their issue with the help of the community.
Emo_Jesus
Messages
2
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
The voltage U1, U2 the current I3 and the resistors R1, R2, R3 are given.
a) Write down the equations needed to calculate U3 using Kirchhoffs Laws and Ohms Laws.
b) calculate U3 using the Network-equations
Relevant Equations
Kirchhoffs 1. and 2. Law, U = R*I
I tried setting up 4 equations using Kirchoffs laws, but the current source is throwing me off, as i dont know wether to include it in the loop, and if it would be smart to transform it into a voltage source.
The equations i have so far are:
I1 + I2 + I3 = I(R3)
I(R3) = I1 + I4
I4 = I2 + I3
U1 = U(R1) + U3

I(R3) being the current through R3, I2 through R2, R1 through R1, and I4 being the one going "right" at the knot under R3

Screenshot_2.png


Any help is highly appreciated, thank you :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Emo_Jesus said:
The equations i have so far are:
I1 + I2 + I3 = I(R3)
I(R3) = I1 + I4
I4 = I2 + I3
U1 = U(R1) + U3

I(R3) being the current through R3, I2 through R2, R1 through R1, and I4 being the one going "right" at the knot under R3
This is the wrong approach.

Nodes and branches in the circuit must be identified correctly.
What is a node in an electrical circuit? What is a branch in an electrical circuit?

All linearly independent equations written by using the first and the second Kirchhoff’s laws must be included.
How many linearly independent equations can be written by using the first Kirchhoff’s law? How many linearly independent equations can be written by using the second Kirchhoff’s law?
 
Yes, you include it in the loop for KVL, sort of. It doesn't matter what the circuit element is for KVL you are simply defining the voltages across each and adding them up.

So KVL for the right most loop (clockwise) is simply ##(-U_3) + (U_3 - U_2) + (U_2) = 0##.
You can then substitute using the circuit element definitions. For example ##(U_3-U_2)=R_2 I_{R2} ##.
You don't have to substitute anything for ##U_2##, it is a known value or independent variable.
You can't substitute anything for ##U_3## since the current source circuit element doesn't define it's own voltage, that is one of the things you need to solve for.

KCL is similar, of course, but with nodes instead of loops.

Be very careful with your definitions and polarities. You must be consistent in all of the equations.
 
Thank you both for the Help, i solved it now! :)
 
  • Like
Likes Gavran and DaveE
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top