Non-Constant Cosmo-Constant: Controversy in GR?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ChrisVer
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the introduction of a variable cosmological constant within the framework of General Relativity, despite its designation as a constant in the Hilbert action. It explores how varying cosmological constants can emerge from higher-dimensional theories, such as Kaluza-Klein reductions, or be incorporated manually into the model. The concept of making the cosmological constant an emergent phenomenon is presented, involving scalar fields in the Lagrangian that include kinetic and potential terms. The right choice of potential allows these scalar fields to asymptotically approach nonzero constants, effectively generating a dynamic cosmological constant. This flexibility of scalar fields in the Lagrangian highlights their potential role in modifying gravitational theories.
ChrisVer
Science Advisor
Messages
3,372
Reaction score
465
I think that in the Hilbert action for the General Relativity /gravity, one can add a constant scalar quantity, which we call the Cosmological Constant.
I am wondering though, how can someone suggest ( after introducing it as a constant ) that this quantity could in fact vary?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I see varying cosmological constants all the time. This comes straightforwardly out of Kaluza-Klein reductions from higher-dimensional theories, or you can just put it in by hand.

This is something you typically do if you want the cosmological constant to be an emergent phenomenon, as follows:

Put some scalar fields in your Lagrangian with the usual kinetic term (or you can put in a sigma model kinetic term with some target space), and also throw in a potential term. For the right choice of potential, your scalars will want to asymptotically approach nonzero constants, thus dynamically generating your cosmological constant.

Scalars are very flexible and can turn up anywhere in the Lagrangian, including as coupling constants for gauge fields.
 
In an inertial frame of reference (IFR), there are two fixed points, A and B, which share an entangled state $$ \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(|0>_A|1>_B+|1>_A|0>_B) $$ At point A, a measurement is made. The state then collapses to $$ |a>_A|b>_B, \{a,b\}=\{0,1\} $$ We assume that A has the state ##|a>_A## and B has ##|b>_B## simultaneously, i.e., when their synchronized clocks both read time T However, in other inertial frames, due to the relativity of simultaneity, the moment when B has ##|b>_B##...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
684
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K