Non-Constant Cosmo-Constant: Controversy in GR?

  • Thread starter ChrisVer
  • Start date
In summary, the conversation discusses the concept of a varying cosmological constant, which can be introduced as a constant quantity in the Hilbert action for General Relativity. This can be achieved through Kaluza-Klein reductions or by including scalar fields in the Lagrangian with the appropriate potential. This allows for the cosmological constant to be an emergent phenomenon rather than a fixed value.
  • #1
ChrisVer
Gold Member
3,378
465
I think that in the Hilbert action for the General Relativity /gravity, one can add a constant scalar quantity, which we call the Cosmological Constant.
I am wondering though, how can someone suggest ( after introducing it as a constant ) that this quantity could in fact vary?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I see varying cosmological constants all the time. This comes straightforwardly out of Kaluza-Klein reductions from higher-dimensional theories, or you can just put it in by hand.

This is something you typically do if you want the cosmological constant to be an emergent phenomenon, as follows:

Put some scalar fields in your Lagrangian with the usual kinetic term (or you can put in a sigma model kinetic term with some target space), and also throw in a potential term. For the right choice of potential, your scalars will want to asymptotically approach nonzero constants, thus dynamically generating your cosmological constant.

Scalars are very flexible and can turn up anywhere in the Lagrangian, including as coupling constants for gauge fields.
 

FAQ: Non-Constant Cosmo-Constant: Controversy in GR?

What is the Non-Constant Cosmo-Constant in the context of General Relativity (GR)?

The Non-Constant Cosmo-Constant, also known as the Cosmological Constant, is a term introduced by Albert Einstein in his theory of General Relativity to account for the observed expansion of the universe. It is a constant value that represents the energy density of the vacuum in the universe.

What is the controversy surrounding the Non-Constant Cosmo-Constant in GR?

The controversy arises from the fact that the Cosmological Constant is a constant value, meaning it does not change over time. This contradicts the fundamental principle of GR that the laws of physics should be the same at all points in space and time. Additionally, the predicted value of the Cosmological Constant from quantum field theory is many orders of magnitude larger than the observed value, leading to the question of why the two values differ so significantly.

How does the Non-Constant Cosmo-Constant affect our understanding of the universe?

The Cosmological Constant plays a significant role in our understanding of the universe as it affects the overall geometry and expansion rate of the universe. It also has implications for the fate of the universe, as a larger value would result in a "closed" universe that eventually collapses, while a smaller value would result in an "open" universe that continues to expand forever.

What are some proposed explanations for the discrepancy between the predicted and observed values of the Non-Constant Cosmo-Constant?

One proposed explanation is that the Cosmological Constant is not, in fact, a constant, but rather varies over time. This idea is supported by recent observations of the accelerating expansion of the universe, which could be explained by a changing Cosmological Constant. Another explanation is the existence of a new, unknown type of energy in the universe that has a repulsive effect on gravity, counteracting the effects of the Cosmological Constant.

How does the Non-Constant Cosmo-Constant impact current research in cosmology and theoretical physics?

The Non-Constant Cosmo-Constant remains a major topic of research in both cosmology and theoretical physics. It has significant implications for our understanding of the origin and evolution of the universe, as well as the fundamental laws of physics. The search for a solution to the Cosmological Constant problem continues to drive new theories and experiments in the field.

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
767
Back
Top