Obtaining the Metric in a Boosted Observer Frame?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mentz114
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Basis Frame
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the metric for a boosted observer frame in a specific spacetime configuration with defined coframe and frame basis vectors. The user presents their calculations for the new frame basis after applying a boost in the phi direction, resulting in a modified set of basis vectors. They express uncertainty about the correctness of their derived coframe basis and seek feedback on potential errors. The user references a source on Riemannian manifolds to clarify the relationship between local frames and dual coframes. The conversation emphasizes the importance of accurate metric derivation in the context of boosted observer frames.
Mentz114
Messages
5,429
Reaction score
292
I'm trying to get a metric in the frame of a boosted observer. The spacetime in question has coframe and frame basis vectors

<br /> \begin{align*}<br /> \vec{\sigma}^0 = \frac{-1}{\sqrt{F}}dt\ \ \ \ &amp; \vec{e}_0 = -\sqrt{F}\partial_t \\<br /> \vec{\sigma}^1 = \sqrt{F}dz\ \ \ \ &amp; \vec{e}_1 = \frac{1}{\sqrt{F}}\partial_z \\<br /> \vec{\sigma}^2 = \sqrt{F}dr\ \ \ \ &amp; \vec{e}_2 = \frac{1}{\sqrt{F}}\partial_r \\<br /> \vec{\sigma}^3 = r\sqrt{F}d\phi\ \ \ \ &amp; \vec{e}_3 = \frac{1}{r\sqrt{F}}\partial_\phi <br /> \end{align*}<br />

Boosting the coordinate frame basis by \beta in the \phi direction gives the new frame basis

<br /> \begin{align*}<br /> \vec{f}_0 &amp;= -\gamma\sqrt{F}\partial_t + \gamma\beta \frac{1}{r\sqrt{F}}\partial_\phi \\<br /> \vec{f}_1 &amp;= \frac{1}{\sqrt{F}}\partial_z \\<br /> \vec{f}_2 &amp;= \frac{1}{\sqrt{F}}\partial_r \\<br /> \vec{f}_3 &amp;= \gamma\frac{1}{r\sqrt{F}}\partial_\phi + \gamma\beta \sqrt{F}\partial_t <br /> \end{align*}<br />

Now, my problem is reading off the new coframe basis s. My attempt is below, but I'm only 50% confident it's right.

<br /> \begin{align*}<br /> {\vec{s}}^0 &amp;= (\gamma\sqrt{F})^{-1}dt+(\gamma\beta)^{-1}r\sqrt{F}d\phi \\<br /> {\vec{s}}^1 &amp;= \sqrt{F}dz \\<br /> {\vec{s}}^2 &amp;= \sqrt{F}dr \\<br /> {\vec{s}}^3 &amp;= \gamma^{-1}r\sqrt{F}d\phi + (\gamma\beta)^{-1}\sqrt{F}dt<br /> \end{align*}<br />

The metric that arises from this is sort of plausible. I'd appreciate any pointers, particularly to any errors.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
From Lee's book "Riemanian Manifolds : An Introduction to Curvature" ( page 30)

Let (E1, . . . , En) be any local frame for TM, that is, n smooth vector fields defined on some open set U such that (E1|p, . . . , En|p) form a basis for TpM at each point p ∈ U. Associated with such a frame is the dual coframe, which we denote (ϕ1, . . . , ϕn); these are smooth 1-forms satisfying ϕi(Ej) = δij.

Couldn't be simpler really.
 
MOVING CLOCKS In this section, we show that clocks moving at high speeds run slowly. We construct a clock, called a light clock, using a stick of proper lenght ##L_0##, and two mirrors. The two mirrors face each other, and a pulse of light bounces back and forth betweem them. Each time the light pulse strikes one of the mirrors, say the lower mirror, the clock is said to tick. Between successive ticks the light pulse travels a distance ##2L_0## in the proper reference of frame of the clock...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K