Our Beautiful Universe - Photos and Videos

In summary: I love it and the clip finishes with a great quote:In summary, these threads are all about the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed).
Astronomy news on Phys.org
  • #2,207
Just saw this post 10 minutes before it sets. :cry:
I tried a week or two ago with no joy; cold wind and a cloud bank to the West, over the ocean.
Just maybe I'll remember tomorrow night. :oldbiggrin:
 
  • Like
Likes DennisN and pinball1970
  • #2,208
Whole sky, whole day, thick grey high-altitude clouds... and now a marine layer coming in.
Oh well.
 
  • Care
  • Sad
Likes pinball1970, collinsmark and DennisN
  • #2,209
Tom.G said:
Whole sky, whole day, thick grey high-altitude clouds... and now a marine layer coming in.
Oh well.

Tell me about it. It's been this way for awhile now. (We might have a clear night next week though. Maybe. But the comet will be too close to the horizon for my setup though.)

2024-04-22 ClearSky.png


Regarding 12P/Pons-Brooks (the "Devil's Comet"), Over a month ago I did attempt to plan out (using Stellarium) a good night for imaging. But if it wasn't weather or personal travel, the comet would have been obstructed by buildings right next to my patio. So at least for this one, no comet for me.
 
Last edited:
  • Sad
  • Care
  • Like
Likes Stavros Kiri, DennisN and pinball1970
  • #2,210
  • Sad
Likes DennisN and pinball1970
  • #2,211
The Blowdryer Galaxy (a.k.a., M100, NGC 4321, Mirror Galaxy), imaged from my back patio, March-April 2024. The galaxy is about 56 million light-years away and can be found in the constellation Coma Berenices.

Blowdryer2024_Final_SmallForPF.jpg

Figure 1. M100.

I understand the "Mirror Galaxy," nickname, due to its symmetry I presume, but I take issue with that name because it's the wrong type of symmetry. Or maybe it's called that due to possible similarity with our Milky Way Galaxy? I'm not sure.

The "Blowdryer Galaxy" nickname has me scratching my head, but that's what the Stellarium software application calls it (I actually like that name better). Try as I might, I can't find an original source. I guess maybe it resembles the vortex or the fan within a blowdryer. So maybe that's it, but still, I have a different hypothesis.

I speculate that there was an amateur astronomer out one night observing M100, perhaps with a group of guests, and the poor sap's corrector plate fogged up from dew. Naturally, the observer scrambled inside to grab a hairdryer and extension cord to warm up the sky-facing optics. I mean, we've all done it. Everyone present thereafter started calling M100 "The Blowdryer Galaxy." This time though, the name stuck and slowly spread to others. That's just my speculation: I have no solid evidence or source as to how this object got its nickname, but that's my guess. If anybody can find a credible reference as to how this galaxy got its "Blowdryer" nickname, let me know.

This is the "first light" target for my new telescope (and first light for some of the filters). I am pleased with the results. More information about the new telescope along with preliminary results for this target can be found in this PF thread:
https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/documenting-the-setup-of-my-new-telescope.1059921/
I'll update that thread with this new image presently, along with some bonus information on dew mitigation.

Equipment:
Celestron C14 EdgeHD telescope*
SkyWatcher EQ8-R Pro mount*
Celestron 0.7x Focal reducer* (for C14 EdgeHD)
Off-axis guider (OAG) with guide camera
Baader LRGB filter set*
Antila 3nm Hα filter*
ZWO ASI6200MM-Pro Main Camera

*first light

Software:
N.I.N.A.
PHD2 Guiding
PixInsight with
o RC-Astro Plugins
o SkyPixels "GAME" plugin

Acquisition/Integration:
Location: San Diego, USA
Bortle Class 7 (maybe 8 ) skies
All subframes binned 2×2
Stacked using drizzle algorithm
L: 532×60 sec = 8.67 hrs
R: 439×60 sec = 7.27 hrs
G: 426×60 sec = 7.10 hrs
B: 472×60 sec = 7.87 hrs
Hα: 16×300 sec + 30×600 sec = 6.33 hours
Total integration time: 37.43 hours
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Love
Likes Stavros Kiri, Skywave, neilparker62 and 4 others
  • #2,212
  • Like
Likes pinball1970 and DennisN
  • #2,213
Canis Major 2024-04-21 19:24:04.

Canis Major 2024-04-21  192404.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes davenn, collinsmark and DennisN
  • #2,214
Just to the left of Wezen in my pic of Canis Major above, there's a corona like grouping of stars. Thought I'd share a couple of pics of other 'coronas' namely Corona Australis close to the tail of Scorpius and Corona Borealis just below the Bootes constellation. Corona Borealis - I understand - is the site where one can expect to see a nova (if it hasn't already happened (?).

Am just wondering if the corona 'pattern' is just a random pattern or if there's perhaps some physics behind why we seem to find a few instances of similarly grouped stars ?

Corona Australis 2024-05-01 04:42:10.

Corona Australis 2024-05-01  044210.jpg


Corona Borealis 2024-05-02 22:34:04

Corona Borealis 2024-05-02  223404.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes pinball1970, Stavros Kiri, collinsmark and 1 other person
  • #2,215
The rain is moving in for a few days, so I am likely finished imaging M51 this year:

M51-St-50829s.jpg


(Nikon D810+800mm f/8 on Losmandy GM-8, 13s subs, 14h integration time; stacking, background subtraction and color correction in AstroPixel Processor)]

Here's at 100%:

M51-St-50829s copy.jpg


As I mentioned previously, I am in many-galaxies-in-one-image season; here's a few that are identified from either Astrometry.net (circles) or Aladin Lite (squares):

10470803_small.jpg


I wonder if there's anyone out there looking back this way.....
 
  • Like
Likes pinball1970, Stavros Kiri, collinsmark and 4 others
  • #2,216
Andy Resnick said:
The rain is moving in for a few days, so I am likely finished imaging M51 this year:

View attachment 344457

(Nikon D810+800mm f/8 on Losmandy GM-8, 13s subs, 14h integration time; stacking, background subtraction and color correction in AstroPixel Processor)]

Here's at 100%:

View attachment 344459

As I mentioned previously, I am in many-galaxies-in-one-image season; here's a few that are identified from either Astrometry.net (circles) or Aladin Lite (squares):

View attachment 344460

I wonder if there's anyone out there looking back this way.....
Don't know exactly how many squares there are in your pic but multiply by 100 billion or so (average no of stars per galaxy) and you have to believe that "someone else" out there is a distinct possibility!

Same question - or similar - posed here.
 
Last edited:
  • #2,217
Clouds moving in for the next week, not going to get much additional time imaging M101:

M101-St-71057s copy.jpeg


The usual setup, 20 hrs integration time. Again, lots of galaxies in the field of view- I only used astrometry.net this time, there's many more in the frame....

10504933.jpeg


...for example, a 1:1 of the peculiar-looking galaxy NGC 5474:

Untitled 2.jpg


NGC 5474 appears to be staring at a trio of galaxies: J140458.21+534358.3, J140458.79+534406.8 (an Active Galaxy Nucleus candidate), and Gaia DR3 1609195779046805376.
 
  • Like
Likes DennisN and collinsmark
  • #2,218
Last night (May 10) the night sky was clear, and the large Aurora Borealis was visible. I didn't try to intentionally image it, because I wasn't sure it would be visible due to the extensive treeline around me. Also, I have never seen it IRL and so had no idea what to look for. Also, I didn't want to waste a night imaging deep sky objects.

IRL, I could barely see the occasional smudge of grey brightness- definitely could not identify any color at any time. However, my camera managed to capture a few images that are pretty wild:

DSC_1019-St.jpg


DSC_1021-St.jpg


DSC_1024-St.jpg


Deets: Nikon D810 + 400/4 lens on Losmandy GM-8, 15s integration time. 14-bit RAW to 8-bit/ch JPG conversion using APP, then ++ color saturation.
 
  • Like
Likes pinball1970, DennisN, Stavros Kiri and 3 others
  • #2,219
Looks very nice.
 
  • #2,220
Hi, I also noticed it at night May 10 -Bohmerwald and made some images by mobile (I saw it first time and was it beatiful experience, although by naked eyes not so colourfull like on images)
 

Attachments

  • IMG_1559.JPG
    IMG_1559.JPG
    26 KB · Views: 25
  • IMG_1561.JPG
    IMG_1561.JPG
    28.3 KB · Views: 21
  • IMG_1556.JPG
    IMG_1556.JPG
    30.5 KB · Views: 39
  • Like
  • Love
  • Wow
Likes davenn, Andy Resnick, collinsmark and 3 others
  • #2,221
And here is sunimage with great sunspots group (as was reported that is in connection with A.B. visibility within our latitude.... :wideeyed: :smile:
 

Attachments

  • IMG_1587b.JPG
    IMG_1587b.JPG
    14.1 KB · Views: 40
  • Like
Likes collinsmark, Stavros Kiri, DennisN and 1 other person
  • #2,222
Following is an area of sky as shown by Stellarium with date set to 6th May 2024 at 4am. We are looking at the constellation of Sagittarius - more recently dubbed the "teapot asterism" - in the vicinity of the Milky Way's galactic centre. Well you might expect Sagittarius A to kick up a little bit of dust and it certainly does that! There are any number of interesting deep sky objects in this pic. In addition to the easily visible stars of the "teapot asterism", I highlight/link to the following as marked by Stellarium: (links are to Wikipedia articles)

NGC6530 / Lagoon Nebula. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NGC_6530
M22 / Great Sagittarius Cluster https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Messier_22
M24 / Small Sagittarius Star Cloud https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Small_Sagittarius_Star_Cloud
M25 / Messier 25 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Messier_25

Teapot Asterism and surroundings 6th May 2024 4am Stellarium.png


And following is my pic of the same: (Canon EOS 600D 55m f/11 15 sec ISO 3200 6th May 4am). Well it's not very spectacular but I think the definition is good enough to identify most of what's shown in the Stellarium view above. (except NGC 6553 as far as I can see anyway!).

Teapot Asterism and surroundings 6th May 2024 4am Canon EOS D600.jpg


See also this pic. Worth zooming in just to see the staggering density of stars in this region.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes pinball1970, DennisN, collinsmark and 1 other person
  • #2,223
The Sombrero Galaxy (M104, NGC 4594) taken from my back patio, April-May 2024. The galaxy can be found in the constellation Virgo and is around 31 million light-years away. The Sombrero Galaxy is a little over a 100,000 light-years in diameter and contains a central, supermassive black hole with the mass of a billion suns.

Sombrero2024_Final_SmallForPF.jpg


Figure 1: The Sombrero Galaxy, M104, NGC 4594.

M104 is called "The Sombrero Galaxy" because it resembles a traditional, Mexican sombrero hat. To see the resemblance, it might help to look at the image upside down. You can do this by turning the image upside down, or alternatively, leaving the image as it is and turning yourself upside down. You'll see a glowing orb that looks to be wearing a 100,000 light-year wide sombrero on top.

I was so hoping to have this image finished and posted by May 5th (Cinco de Mayo), but alas, no. The clouds didn't allow it. San Diego has had overcast skies at night for weeks straight (even if it is sometimes sunny in the daytime). San Diego isn't very accommodating to astronomers in the spring season.

Equipment:
Celestron C14 EdgeHD telescope
SkyWatcher EQ8-R Pro mount
Celestron 0.7x Focal reducer (for C14 EdgeHD)
Off-axis guider (OAG) with guide camera
Baader LRGB filter set
Antlia Hα filter
ZWO ASI6200MM-Pro Main Camera

Software:
N.I.N.A.
PHD2 Guiding
PixInsight with
o RC-Astro Plugins
o SkyPixels "GAME" plugin

Acquisition/Integration:
Location: San Diego, USA
Bortle Class 7 (maybe 8 ) skies
All subframes binned 2×2
Stacked using drizzle algorithm
L: 700×40 sec = 7.78 hrs
R: 445×60 sec = 7.42 hrs
G: 523×60 sec = 8.72 hrs
B: 368×60 sec = 6.13 hrs
Hα: 49×600 sec = 8.17 hrs
Total integration time: 38.21 hours

Below is an image of my telescope in action imaging the The Sombrero Galaxy.

NewTelescopeInAction.jpg

Figure 2. C14 Edge HD pointed toward M104 one night when the galaxy was near the meridian.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Love
Likes davenn, timmdeeg, pinball1970 and 6 others
  • #2,224
collinsmark said:
The Sombrero Galaxy (M104, NGC 4594) taken from my back patio, April-May 2024.
Gorgeous! :kiss:

It's probably my favorite galaxy ever since I first saw it on a photo many, many years ago.
It is the 3D look of the galaxy which I think is just fantastic. :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes Stavros Kiri and collinsmark
  • #2,225
My friend sent me two interesting links to NASA live streams (including audio) I want to share...
I haven't watched any yet, and they seem to be offline at the moment, but I thought they could be fun to have going in the background sometimes...

ISS Stream 1:
Live High-Definition Views from the International Space Station (Official NASA Stream)


ISS Stream 2:
Live Video from the International Space Station (Official NASA Stream)
 
  • Like
Likes pinball1970, Stavros Kiri and collinsmark
  • #2,226
DennisN has a well-timed post: the ISS just flew over me!

DSC_4443-bst-stretch.jpeg.jpg
 
  • Like
  • Wow
  • Love
Likes pinball1970, Stavros Kiri, collinsmark and 2 others
  • #2,227
collinsmark said:
The Sombrero Galaxy (M104, NGC 4594) taken from my back patio, April-May 2024. The galaxy can be found in the constellation Virgo and is around 31 million light-years away. The Sombrero Galaxy is a little over a 100,000 light-years in diameter and contains a central, supermassive black hole with the mass of a billion suns.
How do they estimate the mass of a galaxy's central black hole ? The Milky Way is about the same diameter but Sagittarius A is apparently a lot lighter.
 
  • #2,228
neilparker62 said:
How do they estimate the mass of a galaxy's central black hole ? The Milky Way is about the same diameter but Sagittarius A is apparently a lot lighter.
I would imagine the process is to estimate orbital velocities from Doppler shifts of spectral lines. Then calculate velocities as a function of radius in a model mass distribution of a disc with radially varying mass density. Find the mass distribution that gives you the velocities you see in the data.

If there's no SMBH I'd expect the velocity distribution to go to zero at the core of the galaxy, which will give you a fairly smooth mass distribution. If there's an SMBH I'd expect the velocities to increase near the core, and you'd see a large spike in the mass distribution at the center - that's the mass of your SMBH.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Tom.G
  • #2,229
The 2024 Milky Way photographer of the year (capturetheatlas.com)

"To help you find inspiration for your next astro images, below are the results of the seventh edition of our Milky Way Photographer of the Year, where we publish the best Milky Way images taken around the world."

https://capturetheatlas.com/milky-way-photographer-of-the-year/

One example:

MorningGloryMilkyway-2160P-Jerry-Zhang.jpg

“Milky Way at Morning Glory Pool” – Jerry Zhang
 
  • Like
Likes Astranut, Stavros Kiri, collinsmark and 2 others
  • #2,230
It's taken longer than I expected, but I am finally getting a good panorama of the Virgo supercluster:

Result of Virgo_kappa_low_3_LNC_8th_order-crop--42degCW-1.0x-LZ3-NS-crop-lpc-cbg-St-2.jpg


This panoramic assembly is about a 3 x 5 array of full-frame stacks I've generated since 2016, and a full size print at 200 dpi would be 8 feet on a side. At the center is Markarian's chain:

Untitled.jpg


and in total there are easily several hundred galaxies in this image (from astrometry.net):

10715739 copy.jpeg


The image is still a bit noisy for my liking, but here's a few (approximately) 1:1 crops for flavor:
M60:
Untitled 3.jpg


NGC 4298/NGC 4302
Untitled 8.jpg


NGC 4222/ NGC 4216 / NGC 4206
Untitled 2.jpg


Everything was done in AstroPixelProcessor, 400mm/2.8 Nikkor shot at f/4, Nikon D810 on Losmandy GM-8, 15 subs.
 
  • Like
Likes timmdeeg, neilparker62, collinsmark and 3 others
  • #2,231
June 17, 2024 - NASA rover discovers mysterious light-toned boulder "never observed before" on Mars
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/mars-r...ers-mysterious-boulder-never-observed-before/
While exploring a crater on Mars that may give scientists insights into life that potentially once existed there, NASA said its Perseverance rover made an unprecedented discovery. The rover, which landed on the Red Planet in 2021 specifically to probe the ancient Jezero crater, found a mysterious light-toned boulder earlier this month that was the first of its kind seen on Martian land.

Perseverance encountered the boulder while traversing the Neretva Vallis, a dried river delta that flowed into the crater billions of years ago, on its way to an area inside the rim where rocky outcrops are being examined for sediment that could shed light on Mars' history, said NASA. The rover had changed course along its route to avoid rough terrain when, traveling a short cut through a dune field, it reached a hill that scientists have dubbed Mount Washburn.

The hill was covered with boulders, some of which NASA described as belonging to "a type never observed before on Mars."

One small boulder particularly intrigued the scientists working with Perseverance from Earth. Measuring roughly 18 inches across and 14 inches tall, the speckled and conspicuously light-toned rock was spotted among a field of darker boulders on the hill.

The mysterious boulder has been nicknamed Atoko Point, and a deeper examination of the rock using the rover's instruments suggested that it was composed of the minerals pyroxene and feldspar.

https://www.astronomy.com/space-exploration/mars-rover-discovers-a-strange-red-planet-rock/

Composed of 18 images, this natural-color mosaic shows a boulder field on "Mount Washburn" (named after a mountain in Wyoming) in Mars' Jezero Crater. The Perseverance science team nicknamed the light-toned boulder with dark speckles near the center of the mosaic "Atoko Point" (after a feature in the eastern Grand Canyon). The images were acquired by NASA's Perseverance Mars rover on May 27, 2024, the 1,162nd Martian day, or sol, of the mission.
https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/images/pia26333-standing-out-on-mars-mount-washburn

https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/nasas-perseverance-fords-an-ancient-river-to-reach-science-target
 
  • Like
Likes Stavros Kiri, collinsmark, neilparker62 and 2 others
  • #2,232
Spot the playful Delphinus (Dolphin)) constellation. Altair - in Aquila - is the bright star at lower left.

1720861041674.png
 
  • Like
Likes DennisN
  • #2,233
It took a little longer than I expected, but here's my final image of the region of sky surrounding gamma cygni:

g_cygni-St154436s copy.jpeg


The original is 14k x 12k pixels, good for a 30" x 40" print. Even downscaled, you can see the crescent nebula located near the center. Along the rough diagonal running lower left to upper right, there's NGC 6914, a reflection nebula:

Untitled 2.jpg


running upwards along the diagonal are the butterfly nebula and NGC 6910 (the Rocking horse cluster) to NGC 6871 and all the way up to Sh2-101 (Tulip nebula) and NGC 6857:

Untitled 3.jpg


(200% crop). Lastly, since this view is directly through the milky way, here's a couple of crops of dense star fields:

Untitled 4.jpg


Untitled 5.jpg


Deets: Nikon D810 + Nikkor 400/2.8 @ f/4, 15s exposures. All stacking/montage/post-processing in Astro Pixel Processor.
 
  • Like
  • Love
  • Wow
Likes pinball1970, timmdeeg, Stavros Kiri and 3 others
  • #2,234
This image is called "Lemonade" for reasons that will become clear:

star_trails_2-St copy.jpeg


So, we had a couple F1 tornadoes touch down here on Tuesday and I am currently without electrical power "until further notice". Last night was clear, and with widespread power outages, the sky was relatively dark. Woot!

But I need power for the tracking mount :(

But I can easily do 'star trails': I have a Vivitar 28/2.5 lens that I haven't played around with much so I gave it a spin and am very pleased with the result! Lots of airplanes are visible, and the bright thing in lower center is a firefly. Bright star on the right is Altair and top center is Vega.

Normally, I use my 15/2.8 lens for wide-angle photography, but if I used it here, most of the frame would be trees/houses. The Vivitar is significantly smaller and slightly faster, even though with a 1cm entrance pupil it's hardly a 'light bucket', and surprisingly easy to work with.

Deets: Nikon D810 + Vivitar 28/2.5 (shot at f/2.5), 30s subs until the my bedtime, no tracking. Post-processing was trivial: skip image registration and integrate based on 'maximum intensity'. Then a quick background subtraction in Fiji (20 pixel radius, no smoothing). The background subtraction kinda fails around the tree, but whatevs...
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes pinball1970, Stavros Kiri, timmdeeg and 3 others
  • #2,235
The Croc's Eye Galaxy (a.k.a. M94, NGC 4736, Cat's Eye Galaxy) grabbed from my back patio, May-July 2024. M94 is a spiral galaxy in the constellation Canes Venatici. It has a couple of faint rings surrounding it, now believed to be a complex structure of faint, spiral arms.

CrocsEye2024_Final_SmallForPF.jpg


Equipment:
Celestron C14 EdgeHD telescope
SkyWatcher EQ8-R Pro mount
Celestron 0.7x Focal reducer (for C14 EdgeHD)
Off-axis guider (OAG) with guide camera
Baader LRGB filter set
Antlia Hα filter
ZWO ASI6200MM-Pro Main Camera

Software:
N.I.N.A.
PHD2 Guiding
PixInsight with
o RC-Astro Plugins
o SkyPixels "GAME" plugin

Acquisition/Integration:
Location: San Diego, USA
Bortle Class 7 (maybe 8 ) skies
All subframes binned 2×2
Stacked using drizzle algorithm
L: 455×40 sec = 5.06 hrs
R: 281×60 sec = 4.68 hrs
G: 245×60 sec = 4.08 hrs
B: 225×60 sec = 3.75 hrs
Hα: 24×600 sec = 4.00 hrs
Total integration time: 21.57 hours
 
  • Like
  • Wow
Likes pinball1970, Stavros Kiri, timmdeeg and 5 others
  • #2,236
Region of the sky around NGC 6802 (and next to the 'coathangar cluster'):

NGC_6802_coathangar-St-19020s-1.jpg


Nikon D810 + Nikkor 105/1.4 shot @ f/2 mounted on Losmandy GM-8, 30s subs, 5.25h total integration. Stacking and post-processing in APP.
 
  • Like
Likes DennisN, Stavros Kiri, pinball1970 and 2 others
  • #2,237
Andy Resnick said:
But I need power for the tracking mount :(
Not terribly accurate, but how about an inverter to plug into your car?

I have a small one, 100W that plugs into the accessory socket for the light stuff, and a 1,000W for the Skil Saw. Since I don't have a basement for a workshop, that saves a Lot of clean-up!

The drawbacks for the 1kW inverter are you need really heavy jumper cables to power it, and at continuous use, you have to pause occassionally to get the battery recharged from the stock alternator.

Cheers,
Tom
 
  • #2,238
Tom.G said:
Not terribly accurate, but how about an inverter to plug into your car?

I have a small one, 100W that plugs into the accessory socket for the light stuff, and a 1,000W for the Skil Saw. Since I don't have a basement for a workshop, that saves a Lot of clean-up!

The drawbacks for the 1kW inverter are you need really heavy jumper cables to power it, and at continuous use, you have to pause occassionally to get the battery recharged from the stock alternator.

Cheers,
Tom
Nah... don't feel like running my car for something like this. I used to have a battery to drive the mount, thinking it would make me more mobile, but since I never went anywhere it was quite literally another lead weight to drag around.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes collinsmark and Tom.G
  • #2,239
Saturn, in a photogenic inclination (and orientation):

Untitled.jpg


Nikon D810 + Nikkor 800mm @ f/8, 1/30s, ISO 200; 32 images stacked in APP.
 
  • Like
Likes DennisN, Stavros Kiri, timmdeeg and 2 others
  • #2,240
Andy Resnick said:
Saturn, in a photogenic inclination (and orientation):

View attachment 350229

Nikon D810 + Nikkor 800mm @ f/8, 1/30s, ISO 200; 32 images stacked in APP.
Its green!
Is that real or some atmospheric/ camera effect?
 

Similar threads

Replies
23
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Back
Top