Period of orbiting satellites - Mastering Physics 13.20

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the orbital mechanics of three satellites around a planet, focusing on their periods and forces. Satellite S_1 orbits in 250 minutes with a force of 10,000 N, while S_2, having double the mass, also has a period of 250 minutes and a force of 20,000 N. The user struggles with calculating the period of S_3 and the force on it due to insufficient information about the planet's mass and radius. A method is suggested to derive S_3's period by comparing it to S_1's period using established equations, but the user encounters issues with the force calculations. Ultimately, the user realizes a mistake in applying the force equation, leading to incorrect results.
xanthmode
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Three satellites orbit a planet of radius R, as shown in the figure. Satellites S_1 and S_3 have mass m. Satellite S_2 has mass 2 m. Satellite S_1 orbits in 250 minutes and the force on S_1 is 10,000 N.

See attached figure (knight_Figure_12_26.jpg).

a. What is the period of S_2? Answer: 250 min

b. What is the period of S_3?

c. What is the force on S_2? Answer: 2.00x10^4 N

d. What is the force on S_3?

e. What is the kinetic-energy ratio K_1/K_3 for S_1 and S_3? Answer: 2/3


Homework Equations




F=\frac{G m_1 m_2}{r^2}

T^2 = ( \frac{4 \pi ^2}{G M} ) r^3

The Attempt at a Solution



Parts (a) and (c) are obvious since mass does not effect the period and mass of S_2 is twice that of S_1 so it will have twice the force. The answer for (e) was also pretty easy since the only difference between the equations for the period would be the radius 2r vs. 3r.

I am having trouble with parts (b) and (d) due to a lack of information. I don't know the planet's radius or its mass. I can't see a way to substitute one equation into another to remove a variable either. I have too many unknowns and I just don't see a way to simplify it.

Any help would be greatly appreciated.
 

Attachments

  • knight_Figure_12_26.jpg
    knight_Figure_12_26.jpg
    8.7 KB · Views: 1,113
Physics news on Phys.org
Can't see the attachment yet, but I'll hazard a guess...satellite 1 has an orbital radius of 2r while satellite 3 has an orbital radius of 3r based on what part of your answer, right?
Then the period of satellite 3 can be obtained from the 2nd equation you have via comparing it with the case for satellite 1 (since 4pi^2/GM is a constant). Just formulate the equation for both satellite 1 and satellite 3, then divide one of the equations by the other - the constant term cancels out.
A similar method can be done for (d)
 
Okay I got the answer for part (b) and I tried to do the same kind of operation for part (d) but The answer doesn't seem to work out.

F_1 = \frac{G m_1 m_2}{(2r)^2}

F_3 = \frac{G m_1 m_2}{(3r)^2}

\frac{F_1}{F_3} = \frac{\frac{G m_1 m_2}{(2r)^2}}{\frac{G m_1 m_2}{(3r)^2}}

\frac{F_1}{F_3} = \frac{3^3}{2^3}

...and F_1 = 10000 so...

F_3 = 10000 \frac{8}{27} = 2963

But Mastering Physics says this is wrong. See anything wrong?
 
Screwed up the force equation in the last few steps. The denominator should be r^2 rather than r^3. Thanks so much for your help Fightfish.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top