- #71
Burnsys
- 66
- 0
J77 said:My gorillas would eat them kittens for breakfast
(Kitten photos should've been banned from this competition. In fact, banned from the net in general )
They have to catch them first! ok, maybe the little one.
J77 said:My gorillas would eat them kittens for breakfast
(Kitten photos should've been banned from this competition. In fact, banned from the net in general )
[/URL]Integral said:Small, cute and cuddly has been done pretty thoughly in this thread. So ...
RIP Keiko
http://home.comcast.net/~integral50/keiko.jpg
0TheSwerve0 said:Has the website with pics of baby animals been posted on this forum yet? http://www.babyanimalz.com/
Danger said:You never saw "Them"? And a tapeworm can easily exceed 6 feet when held vertically.
Moonbear said:Is too! I think s/he lives under my deck (or I hope that's what I hear rustling around under there ). I'm still waiting for DocToxyn to come along and tell me what type of froggy it is. I think I posted the more washed out looking photo last time, because it was more of a close-up. This one came out more vivid (I took about 5 pictures of it, playing with different exposure settings and with/without flash, etc., before it got annoyed and hopped away).
Ehhh... some not so much. What the hell are those things clinging to the guy's fingers about half-way down page 1? I've never seen primates that small.scorpa said:OMG those are so cute!
'Insect', when applied to a person (or in this case a Yomamma), indicates a generic pest of non-specific taxonomic classification.DocToxyn said:...and tapeworms are segmented worms, not insects.
[/URL]Integral said:Small, cute and cuddly has been done pretty thoughly in this thread. So ...
RIP Keiko
http://home.comcast.net/~integral50/keiko.jpg
Danger said:Ehhh... some not so much. What the hell are those things clinging to the guy's fingers about half-way down page 1? I've never seen primates that small.
Danger said:Ehhh... some not so much. What the hell are those things clinging to the guy's fingers about half-way down page 1? I've never seen primates that small.
Today I violated every safety rule and instinctively braked hard to let a chipmunk across the road. There's one little guy that made it another day. I do this pretty routinely, because I ride a motorcycle on every good day and hitting even relatively small animals like porcupines and raccoons can mess up your day on a bike. Chipmunks are pretty tiny, but I have a soft spot for animals, and will do what I can for them if I'm not being tailgated by the vehicle behind me. I have stopped my bike and helped snapping turtles across the road - and they do NOT appreciate the help, although it might help another generation hatch and survive!Evo said:Everything I'm reading today is about animals dying.
Until the sisterhood drags you kicking and screaming into "It's a Small World" and leaves you trapped there, no more sky, just thousands of wannbe Chucky dolls, and "It's a Small World" song playing over and over and over...you can't take the sky from me
Definitely not a bullfrog. It wasn't "bumpy" enough for that. I'll look up some photos of Rana clamitans and see if it looks like the fellow that came to visit.DocToxyn said:Yes, it certainly is an animal and I think it's a green frog, Rana clamitans, but it's hard to tell from that angle. The only other species would be bullfrog, Rana catesbeiana. You need to check for the presence or absence of dorso-lateral ridges (they run on the back from the eyes to the caudal area), the green frog will have them. The only other way is to get him to call for you (if its a male)...I'll leave it up to Moonbear how she wants to proceed with that...
Thanks, Swerve. Jeez, we have marmosets here and the bloody things are the size of a beagle.0TheSwerve0 said:I think that's a pygmy marmoset.
I might not know a pygmy marmoset when I see it, but I'm pretty sure that these little buggers are hedgehogs.scorpa said:http://www.babyanimalz.com/images/pic13648.jpg what the heck are those? those were one of the few things on that site that were definitely not cute.
Yes they are cute! Awwwwwwwwwww! They're baby hedgehogs. How adorable.scorpa said:http://www.babyanimalz.com/images/pic13648.jpg what the heck are those? those were one of the few things on that site that were definitely not cute.
I bet you got soaked, no? (That question looks really French, no?)ZapperZ said:http://img336.imageshack.us/img336/7935/vacation20021443yu.jpg
Zz.
Great timing! The shutter in my Camedia 3040 has a frustrating delay, making action shots like this tough. Now, why would they display the killer whale show on that big TV? I can see it if they've got a cute routine going with a sea otter, but killers are hard to miss.ZapperZ said:http://img336.imageshack.us/img336/7935/vacation20021443yu.jpg
Zz.
I was thinking the same thing.Danger said:Yeah... the real ones are bigger than the picture.
Evo said:I'm just amazed by the synchronization of those animals. It's almost flawless.
They're just waiting for someone to give them the signal to eat the treat they're balancing on their nose.Evo said:I'm just amazed by the synchronization of those animals. It's almost flawless.
Wait, isn't that what you said to me last night?twisting_edge said:Quite simply the most darlingest beast that ever there was
Beeza said:Heres a picture of my mothers dog Mabel when she was a puppy. Shes fully grown now and about 3 years old.