I Photon Directionality: Do Opposite Photons Change Direction?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter intervoxel
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Photon
intervoxel
Messages
192
Reaction score
1
When a pair of photons is formed after annihilation, they have opposite directionality as cos2(θ).
If one of them is detected, it collapses immediately, being absorbed by an atom. Does this mean that its peer has its directionality changed to a 'needle'-like pattern?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Annihilation of what ?
In what context is the ##\cos^2\theta## distribution obtained ?
For collisions you have conservation of energy and momentum. In the center of mass of the annihilating particles the photons are back to back.
 
Electron-positron collision.
 
And ##\theta## ?
 
I think you have to state a couple of things here. Yes, there is conservation of momentum. That does not automatically imply that the photons go in opposite directions, nor that they carry equal energy. Not sure you intended to imply that anyway. However, those photons are entangled. A tight position measurement on one might tell you something about the other IF you had performed a similar tight position measurement on it.

But remember with entangled particles: a) you cannot obtain more information about 1 than the HUP allows; b) you cannot say which is collapsing which (assuming you use a collapse model) since the order of measurements tell you nothing.

And obviously, you have to consider the usual details such as where the annihilation occurred (i.e. that might have a large spread).
 
  • Like
Likes dlgoff and intervoxel
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA

Similar threads

Back
Top