Potential energy of a displaced mass on a spring

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the potential energy U(x) stored in a spring with a non-linear restoring force, given by F(x) = (-k1x) + (k2x^2). The user attempts to integrate this force to find the potential energy, resulting in ΔU = -k1(½x0^2) + k2(⅓x0^3). However, there is confusion regarding the application of the standard potential energy formula U = ½kx^2, which is only valid for linear springs. Participants suggest refining the approach to ensure consistency in the equations used, particularly emphasizing that ΔU should reflect a difference between two states. The conversation highlights the importance of correctly interpreting the equations for potential energy in the context of non-linear spring behavior.
AsadaShino92
Messages
21
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A spring of negligible mass exerts a restoring force on a point mass M given by F(x)= (-k1x)+(k2x^2) where k1 and k2 >0. Calculate the potential energy U(x) stored in the spring for a displacement x. Take U=0 at x=0.

Homework Equations



ΔU=∫F(x)dx
U=½kx^2

The Attempt at a Solution


Using the equation above I tried to find the potential energy of the spring after it has been displaced by some distance x. I integrated F(x) from x=0 to some displacement x=x0.

ΔU=∫(-k1x)+(k2x^2)dx

ΔU=-k1½x0^2+k2⅓x0^3

Is this the right way in finding the potential energy?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Almost. Basically you are going to refine your second relevant equation. So if ##k_2 = 0## you should find it back. Do you ?

[edit] hint: what about the discrepancy between 1st and 2nd relevant equation ?
 
BvU said:
Almost. Basically you are going to refine your second relevant equation. So if ##k_2 = 0## you should find it back. Do you ?

[edit] hint: what about the discrepancy between 1st and 2nd relevant equation ?

So then I can use the fact that ΔU= Uf-Ui= ½kxf^2-½kxi^2. Where f is final and i is initial?
If this is correct, then xi=0 and that term drops out. Then I would be left with ½kxf^2 = -k1½x0^2+k2⅓x0^3
 
AsadaShino92 said:
U=½kx^2
No. As BvU was hinting, that equation is only valid if F(x)=-kx.
AsadaShino92 said:
So then I can use the fact that ΔU= Uf-Ui= ½kxf^2-½kxi^2.
No, for the reason given above.
AsadaShino92 said:
ΔU=-k1½x0^2+k2⅓x0^3

Is this the right way in finding the potential energy?
Yes, except that you have a Δ on the left, implying a difference between two different states. On the right, you have assumed that one of those states is x=0. Try to write it consistently.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
1K
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K