Potential on the axis of a uniformly charged ring

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the electric potential due to a uniformly charged ring. The potential is derived by integrating the contributions from each element of the ring, leading to the formula V = (λ/(2ε₀))(R/√(z²+R²)). There is emphasis on the importance of using the correct path for integration, as the electric field's circulation around the ring is zero. The initial approach was critiqued for not considering the field at points on the ring, which is essential for accurate potential calculation. Ultimately, the derived formula aligns with the expected result for the potential at a point along the axis of the charged ring.
Guillem_dlc
Messages
188
Reaction score
17
Homework Statement
We have a uniformly charged ring of radius ##R## with a linear charge density ##\lambda##. Determine the potential at a point on its axis at a distance ##z## from the plane of the ring.

Answer: ##V=\dfrac{\lambda}{2\varepsilon_0}\dfrac{R}{\sqrt{z^2+R^2}}##
Relevant Equations
##V_z=\int E\cdot dl##
We know that
$$V_Z=\int_{\textrm{ring}} E\cdot dl$$
We therefore consider ##E=\dfrac{\lambda}{2\pi \varepsilon_0}\cdot \dfrac1r##. Then,
$$V_Z=\int_{\textrm{ring}} \dfrac{\lambda}{2\pi \varepsilon_0}\cdot \dfrac1r\, dl = \dfrac{\lambda}{2\pi \varepsilon_0}\dfrac1r \int_{\textrm{ring}}dl=$$
$$=\dfrac{\lambda}{\cancel{2\pi} \varepsilon_0}\dfrac1r \cancel{2\pi} R=\dfrac{\lambda}{\varepsilon_0}\cdot \dfrac{R}{r}=\dfrac{\lambda}{\varepsilon_0}\dfrac{R}{\sqrt{z^2+R^2}},$$
where ##r=\sqrt{z^2+R^2}##.
I have done this.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's just an accident that your answer is close to the right one. To calculate the circulation of the electric field around the ring you will need the field at points on the ring not somewhere on the axis. This field is not directed tangential to the path, And anyway, this integral around the ring (closed path) should be zero. so it will be useless.
You need to calculate the potential by integrating the contributions of each element of the ring to the potential to the given point on the axis. Similar to what you did for the electric field of the ring.
Or, you could use the definitionn of potential based on the integral of the electric field but then you need to integrate from the given pont to infinity and use the right path (and right formula for the field).
 
nasu said:
It's just an accident that your answer is close to the right one. To calculate the circulation of the electric field around the ring you will need the field at points on the ring not somewhere on the axis. This field is not directed tangential to the path, And anyway, this integral around the ring (closed path) should be zero. so it will be useless.
You need to calculate the potential by integrating the contributions of each element of the ring to the potential to the given point on the axis. Similar to what you did for the electric field of the ring.
Or, you could use the definitionn of potential based on the integral of the electric field but then you need to integrate from the given pont to infinity and use the right path (and right formula for the field).
Now I had done this and I would say it's fine. We have a charged ring:

$$V=\int_{\textrm{ring}} dV=\int_{\textrm{ring}} k\dfrac{dq}{r}=\int_{\textrm{ring}} k\dfrac{\lambda dl}{r}=k\dfrac{\lambda}{r}\int_{2\pi R}dl=$$
$$=k\dfrac{\lambda}{r}2\pi R=\dfrac{1}{4\pi \varepsilon_0}\dfrac{\lambda}{r}2\pi R=\dfrac{\lambda}{2\varepsilon_0}\dfrac{R}{\sqrt{z^2+R^2}}$$
 
It looks like you got the right answer. Doesn't it?
 
  • Like
Likes Guillem_dlc
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top