Probability and probability amplitude

phyky
Messages
57
Reaction score
0
|A>=a|0>+b|1>
<A|A>=probability amp |<A|A>|^2=probability
If the state is same, so <A|A>= a^2+b^2=1. then i find the probability and no interference term in it!
so can i say <A|A>=|<A|A>|^2 and no square is needed? since if i square it become a^4+b^4=??
what wrong with it! and where should i place interference term?!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
|A> is the probability amplitude.
<A|A> is the probability.
Maybe you are confusing the situation with transition amplitudes where <A|B> is the amplitude of transition from A to B?
 
so if transition from A to B it need |<B|A>|^2 to find interference term? and <A|A> show only probability but nothing about interference? but its outer product |A><A| does show interference?
 
|A>=a|0>+b|1> so <A|A>=a^2<0|0>+b^2<1|1>+a*b<0|1>+b*a<1|0> where <i|j>=0 <i|i>=1. where the interference term?
 
You looking for interference between orthogonal states then. Why would you expect there to be some?
 
As for a normalized wave function |A>, a^2+b^2=1. However, <A|A>is not equal to a^2+b^2but a^2+b^2+a*b+ab* , generally speaking, the latter is not equal to 1. <A|A>=|A>|^2, would it help?
 
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
64
Views
5K
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
534
Back
Top