Problem about a block of ice melting (specific latent heat)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the energy transfer between melting ice and surrounding water, emphasizing that the energy lost by the water equals the energy gained by the ice. The equations presented illustrate this balance, but the lack of specific temperature data complicates the calculations. It is assumed that thermal equilibrium is reached at 0 degrees Celsius, as both ice and water must coexist at this temperature to prevent further melting. This assumption is crucial for solving for the latent heat of fusion, as it provides the necessary conditions for the experiment. Understanding this equilibrium is essential for accurate calculations in thermodynamic scenarios involving phase changes.
RateOfReturn
Messages
7
Reaction score
4
Homework Statement
A mass of 160 g of water at 100 °C is poured into the hollow. The water has specific
heat capacity 4.20 kJ kg-1 K-1. Some of the ice melts and the final mass of water in the
hollow is 365 g.
(i) Assuming no heat gain from the atmosphere, calculate a value, in kJ kg-1, for the
specific latent heat of fusion of ice. [3]
Relevant Equations
E= mcΔt
E=ml
1683999244901.png


Energy lost by water = Energy gained by ice

Energy lost by water = 0.16 x 4200 x (100-t)
Energy gained by ice = 0.205 x L + 0.205 x (t) (where t is the temperature at thermal equilibrium). However, there does not appear to be enough info to continue.

The solution, however, considered t to be 0- whilst not explicitly mentioned in the questions is this because the water remaining in the hollow and to prevent further ice melting we can assume they must have the same temperature ?
1683999591377.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
RateOfReturn said:
The solution, however, considered t to be 0- whilst not explicitly mentioned in the questions is this because the water remaining in the hollow and to prevent further ice melting we can assume they must have the same temperature ?
Yes. We are to assume that the experimenter waited until an equilibrium was reached. An equilibrium with water and ice coexisting would naturally be at 0 degrees C.

The experimenter would be wise to do this because, as you noted, he otherwise would lack the ability to solve for the latent heat of fusion with the information that was collected.
 
  • Like
Likes RateOfReturn
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top