Proving a complex wave satisfies Helmholtz equation

AI Thread Summary
A harmonic wave is represented by the equation Ψ(x, t) = U(x, y, z)e^{-iωt}, where U is the complex amplitude. The task is to demonstrate that U satisfies the Helmholtz equation, (∇² + k²)U(x, y, z) = 0. Initial attempts to express U in terms of Ψ and e^{-iωt} led to complex derivations without reaching the expected result. The key realization is that understanding the harmonic nature of Ψ simplifies the problem, making it easier to show that U satisfies the Helmholtz equation. This highlights the importance of recognizing the properties of harmonic waves in solving related equations.
Matt Chu
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Consider a harmonic wave given by

$$\Psi (x, t) = U(x, y, z) e^{-i \omega t}$$

where ##U(x, y, z)## is called the complex amplitude. Show that ##U## satisfies the Helmholtz equation:

$$ (\nabla + k^2) U (x, y, z) = 0 $$

Homework Equations



Everything important already in the problem.

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
The first thing I attempted to do was to express ##U## in terms of ##\Psi## and ##e^{-i \omega t}##. This led me to a long set of derivations that in no way gave me anything remotely close to zero. I'm confused as to how to solve this, as the ##k## component of the Helmholtz equation seems to be problematic; it seems the only way to prove that the whole expression equals zero would be if ##U = 0##.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello Matt,

How do you make use of the given that ##\Psi## is a harmonic wave ? What equation does ##\Psi## satisfy ?
 
BvU said:
Hello Matt,

How do you make use of the given that ##\Psi## is a harmonic wave ? What equation does ##\Psi## satisfy ?

Yeah, just figured that out a few minutes ago.
 
Good! makes it an easy exercise.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top