QED Lagrangian in terms of left- and right-handed spinors

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the QED Lagrangian using four-component chiral fields, specifically left-handed and right-handed Dirac fields. The original Lagrangian is expressed in terms of the total Dirac field, which is then separated into its chiral components using projection operators. The key realization is that the projectors do not commute with the gamma matrices, but their anti-commutation relations allow for manipulation that leads to the desired form of the Lagrangian. Ultimately, the solution involves expressing each term of the Lagrangian in terms of the left- and right-handed fields, confirming the transformation is valid. The problem is resolved by correctly applying the properties of the projectors and gamma matrices.
sebomba
Messages
3
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


I'm stuck at my particle physics exercise about 4-component chiral fields.

The following problem is given: "Derive the expression for the QED Lagrangian in terms of the four component right-handed and left-handed Dirac fields ##\Psi_R(x)## and ##\Psi_L(x)##, respectively."

What I understand is that I need to get from the QED Lagrangian:

$$\mathscr{L}_{QED}=-\frac{1}{4} F_{\rho \sigma} F^{\rho \sigma}+\bar{\Psi} i \gamma^{\mu} \partial \Psi - m \bar{\Psi} \Psi - e A_\mu \bar{\Psi} \gamma^{\mu} \Psi$$

to here:

$$\mathscr{L}_{QED}=-\frac{1}{4} F_{\rho \sigma} F^{\rho \sigma}+\bar{\Psi}_L i \gamma^{\mu} \partial \Psi_L + \bar{\Psi}_R i \gamma^{\mu} \partial \Psi_R - m \bar{\Psi}_L \Psi_R - m \bar{\Psi}_R \Psi_L - e A_\mu [ \bar{\Psi}_L \gamma^{\mu} \Psi_L + \bar{\Psi}_R \gamma^{\mu} \Psi_R ]$$

Homework Equations


The operators ##\Psi## can be written in terms of the left- and right handed fields: \begin{equation}\Psi= \Psi_L +\Psi_R\end{equation}
The left- and right handed fields can be expressed through the projectors ##P_L## and ##P_R## so that:
\begin{equation}\Psi_L=P_L \Psi \quad \Psi_R=P_R \Psi\end{equation}
The projectors are:
$$P_L=\frac{1}{2}(1-\gamma^5) \quad P_R=\frac{1}{2}(1+\gamma^5)$$
With the properties:
$$P_{L,R}^2=P_{L,R} \quad P_L P_R=0 \quad P_L + P_R = 1$$
All properties of the ##\gamma##-matrices are given too.

The Attempt at a Solution


My first step was to take the second term of the lagrangian and rewrite it with help of equation (1) and (2):
$$\bar{\Psi} (P_L + P_R) i \gamma^{\mu} \partial (P_L +P_R) \Psi$$
Then I tried it with resolving the statement between the ##\Psi##'s and looking where it leads, but I ended up with long calculation and a nonsense statement in the end.
Then I realized that the parenthesis are scalars, so i could write:
$$\bar{\Psi} (P_L + P_R)(P_L +P_R) i \gamma^{\mu} \partial \Psi$$
With the properties of the projectors I then get:
$$\bar{\Psi} (P_L + P_R)^2 i \gamma^{\mu} \partial \Psi$$
$$\bar{\Psi} (P_L^2 + P_R^2) i \gamma^{\mu} \partial \Psi$$
$$\bar{\Psi} P_L^2 i \gamma^{\mu} \partial \Psi +\bar{\Psi} P_R^2i \gamma^{\mu} \partial \Psi$$
As the projectors do not commute with the ##\gamma##-matrices (I checked that myself), I can't get the projectors to the other ##\Psi##'s on the right side, which would lead to the wanted end result.

I think that I am missing something important or very trivial. Maybe I need another approach for the problem. Could someone help me there?
Thanks in advance.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
Physics news on Phys.org
I just solved the puzzle by myself.

The projectors and the ##\gamma##-matrices may not commute directly, but you can consider something that follows from the anti-commutation relation $$\{\gamma^5,\gamma^\mu\}=0$$. If we multiply ##\gamma^\mu## and ##P_L=\frac{1}{2}(1-\gamma^5)## we get of course:
$$\gamma^\mu P_L=\frac{1}{2}(\gamma^\mu-\gamma^\mu \gamma^5) $$
But from the anticommutator we know that ##\gamma^\mu \gamma^5=-\gamma^5 \gamma^\mu##. We can plug this in and pull the ##\gamma^\mu## out of the parenthesis. And so we get the following:
$$\gamma^\mu P_L=\frac{1}{2}(\gamma^\mu-\gamma^\mu \gamma^5) = \frac{1}{2}(\gamma^\mu+\gamma^5 \gamma^\mu) =\frac{1}{2}(1+\gamma^5)\gamma^\mu=P_R \gamma^\mu$$
$$\rightarrow \gamma^\mu P_L=P_R \gamma^\mu$$
Of course this works the other way around too: ##P_L \gamma^\mu=\gamma^\mu P_R##
Let's take a attempt simmilar to my second attempt from my post above and use it on ##\bar{\Psi} \gamma^\mu\Psi##:
\begin{align*} \bar{\Psi} \gamma^\mu\Psi &= \Psi^{\dagger} \gamma^0 \gamma^\mu\Psi \\
&=\Psi^{\dagger}(P_L+P_R) \gamma^0 \gamma^\mu (P_L+P_R)\Psi \\
&=\Psi^{\dagger}(P_L^2+P_R^2)\gamma^0 \gamma^\mu \Psi \\
&=\Psi^{\dagger}P_L P_L \gamma^0 \gamma^\mu \Psi +\Psi^{\dagger}P_R P_R\gamma^0 \gamma^\mu \Psi \\
&=\Psi^{\dagger}P_L \gamma^0 P_R \gamma^\mu \Psi +\Psi^{\dagger}P_R \gamma^0 P_L \gamma^\mu \Psi \\
&=\Psi^{\dagger}P_L \gamma^0 \gamma^\mu P_L \Psi +\Psi^{\dagger}P_R \gamma^0 \gamma^\mu P_R\Psi \\
&=\Psi^{\dagger}_L \gamma^0 \gamma^\mu \Psi_L +\Psi^{\dagger}_R \gamma^0 \gamma^\mu \Psi_R \\
&=\bar{\Psi}_L \gamma^\mu \Psi_L +\bar{\Psi}_R \gamma^\mu \Psi_R
\end{align*}
This works for all the terms in the Lagrangian analogously.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top