Quick Question about the Christoffel Symbol of the Second Kind

  • Thread starter Thread starter TheEtherWind
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Christoffel Symbol
Click For Summary
The Christoffel symbol of the second kind is defined as {\Gamma ^{m}}_{ab}=\frac{1}{2}g^{mk}(g_{ak,b}+g_{bk,a}-g_{ab,k}), with k being a dummy index summed over the full range of indices in a given manifold. In a standard 4-D spacetime context, this means k ranges from 0 to 3. The confusion arises from the nature of the dummy index, which may not seem directly related to the spacetime coordinates. However, understanding it in the context of Einstein summation notation clarifies its application in a 4-dimensional manifold. Overall, the Christoffel symbol's formulation aligns with the conventions of tensor calculus in relativity.
TheEtherWind
Messages
53
Reaction score
0
The Christoffel symbol is as followed:

{\Gamma ^{m}}_{ab}=\frac{1}{2}g^{mk}(g_{ak,b}+g_{bk,a}-g_{ab,k})

where k is a dummy index. What values is it summed over? If I had to guess I'd say 0 to 3, but it seems somewhat counter intuitive.

Does the Christoffel symbol become

{\Gamma ^{m}}_{ab}=\frac{1}{2}([g^{m0}(g_{a0,b}+g_{b0,a}-g_{ab,0})]+[g^{m1}(g_{a1,b}+g_{b1,a}-g_{ab,1})]+[g^{m2}(g_{a2,b}+g_{b2,a}-g_{ab,2})]+[g^{m3}(g_{a3,b}+g_{b3,a}-g_{ab,3})])

?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You've got it right, at least for the "standard" case in relativity of a 4-D spacetime. The general rule is that summed indexes range over the full range of indexes in whatever manifold you are working with.
 
Why is this counter intuitive? It simply follows from the einstein summnation notation.
 
I understand the Einstein summation notation. I found it somewhat counter intuitive seeing as how it was a dummy index that didn't seem to "be" the 4 coordinates of space-time in any equation or tensor, etc. but it makes more sense the way PeterDonis said it... it's on a 4-dimensional manifold...
 
In an inertial frame of reference (IFR), there are two fixed points, A and B, which share an entangled state $$ \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(|0>_A|1>_B+|1>_A|0>_B) $$ At point A, a measurement is made. The state then collapses to $$ |a>_A|b>_B, \{a,b\}=\{0,1\} $$ We assume that A has the state ##|a>_A## and B has ##|b>_B## simultaneously, i.e., when their synchronized clocks both read time T However, in other inertial frames, due to the relativity of simultaneity, the moment when B has ##|b>_B##...

Similar threads

Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K