I Radiance and energy density of a black body

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the relationship between the radiance and energy density of a black body, referencing Planck's law and the Stefan-Boltzmann law. It details the integration of energy density over frequencies to show that the total energy density is proportional to the fourth power of temperature. The conversation also explores the derivation of the effusion rate formula from chemistry, relating particle density and average speed to the radiance emitted by a black body. A key point is the calculation of the fraction of particles passing through an aperture, which involves geometric considerations of projected area and uniform particle distribution. This analysis ultimately aids in understanding the Planck blackbody function, reinforcing the connection between thermodynamic principles and radiation.
Airton Rampim
Messages
6
Reaction score
1
How can I find the relation between the radiance and the energy density of a black body? According to Planck's law, the energy density inside a blackbody cavity for modes with frequency ##\nu \in [\nu, \nu + \mathrm{d}\nu]## is given by $$ \rho(\nu, T)\mathrm{d}\nu = \frac{8\pi\nu^2}{c^3}\frac{h\nu}{\exp\left(\frac{h\nu}{k T}\right) - 1}\mathrm{d}\nu. $$ Integrating over all the frequencies we will have

$$ \rho_T = \intop_0^{\infty}\rho(\nu, T)\mathrm{d}\nu = \frac{8\pi h}{c^3} \intop_0^\infty \frac{\nu^3}{\exp\left(\frac{h\nu}{k T}\right) - 1}\mathrm{d} \nu $$

$$ \rho_T = \frac{8\pi h}{c^3}\left(\frac{k T}{h}\right)^4 \underbrace{\intop_0^\infty \frac{u^3}{\exp\left(u\right) - 1}\mathrm{d} u}_{\zeta(4)\Gamma(4) = \pi^4/15} = \frac{8\pi^5 k^4}{15 h^3 c^3}T^4 $$

At equilibrium, these modes will have the same energy of the blackbody that is proportional to the fourth power of the temperature. This is the same result predicted by Stefan-Boltzmann law for the radiance of a black body

$$ R_T = \intop_0^\infty R(\nu, T)\mathrm{d}\nu = \sigma T^4, $$

where ##R(\nu, T)\mathrm{d}\nu## is the radiance emitted by frequencies between ##\nu## and ##\nu + \mathrm{d}\nu## and ##\sigma## is the Stefan-Boltzmann constant. My question is how can I find the following relation

$$ R(\nu, T)\mathrm{d}\nu = \frac{c}{4} \rho(\nu, T)\mathrm{d}\nu? $$
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is an effusion rate formula from chemistry: The number of particles per unit area per unit time that emerge from an aperture is ## R=\frac{n \bar{v}}{4} ##, where ## n ## is the particle density, (number of particles per unit volume), and ## \bar{v} ## is the average speed. ## \\ ## ==========================================================================## \\ ## I have also derived this formula during my undergraduate days, and I still remember the derivation, which involves a double integral. Let me write out this derivation momentarily: ## \\ ## Let ## g(v) ## be the speed distribution of the particles that have density ## n ##. The number of particles ## N ## that emerge from an aperture of area ## A ## in time ## \Delta t ## is given by ##N=n \int\limits_{r=0}^{+\infty} \int\limits_{\theta=0}^{\pi/2} \int\limits_{\phi=0}^{2 \pi} r^2 \, \sin{\theta} \, d \theta \, d \phi \, dr \frac{A \cos{\theta}}{4 \pi r^2} \int\limits_{\frac{r}{\Delta t}}^{+\infty} g(v) \, dv ##. ## \\ ## The ##\phi ## integral gives ## 2 \pi ##, and the ## \sin{\theta} \cos{\theta} \, d \theta ## integral gives ## \frac{1}{2} ##, so we have ## N=\frac{nA}{4} \int\limits_{r=0}^{+\infty} dr \, \int\limits_{v=\frac{r}{\Delta t}}^{+\infty} g(v) \, dv ##. ## \\ ## Reversing the order of integration, it becomes ## N=\frac{nA}{4} \int\limits_{v=0}^{+\infty} g(v) \, dv \, \int\limits_{r=0}^{v \, \Delta t} \, dr ## , which gives the result ## N=\frac{nA \, \Delta t}{4} \int\limits_{v=0}^{+\infty} g(v) v \, dv=\frac{nA \, \Delta t \, \bar{v}}{4} ##. ## \\ ## Finally, ## R=\frac{N}{A \, \Delta t}=\frac{n \bar{v}}{4} ##. ## \\ ## Note: The reason for the ## v=\frac{r}{\Delta t } ## term on the lower limit of the velocity distribution is that the particle needs to be moving fast enough to get to the aperture in time ## \Delta t ##. The derivation basically assumes a collisionless gas. The fraction of particles that are moving in the direction of the aperture is ## \frac{A \cos{\theta}}{4 \pi r^2} ##. The aperture ## A ## is assumed to be small. ## \\ ## The coordinate system is a spherical coordinate system whose origin is at the aperture. The gas is in the upper hemisphere above the aperture, and the density is uniform, and the speed distribution function, ## g(v) ## (normalized to 1), is independent of position. ## \\ ## ======================================================================== ## \\ ## The above result is very useful in doing a derivation of the Planck blackbody function, where the cavity is assumed to contain a photon gas of particles all moving at speed ## c ##, so that ## \bar{v}=c ##.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Airton Rampim and dextercioby
Charles Link said:
This is an effusion rate formula from chemistry: The number of particles per unit area per unit time that emerge from an aperture is ## R=\frac{n \bar{v}}{4} ##, where ## n ## is the particle density, (number of particles per unit volume), and ## \bar{v} ## is the average speed. ## \\ ## ==========================================================================## \\ ## I have also derived this formula during my undergraduate days, and I still remember the derivation, which involves a double integral. Let me write out this derivation momentarily: ## \\ ## Let ## g(v) ## be the speed distribution of the particles that have density ## n ##. The number of particles ## N ## that emerge from an aperture of area ## A ## in time ## \Delta t ## is given by ##N=n \int\limits_{r=0}^{+\infty} \int\limits_{\theta=0}^{\pi/2} \int\limits_{\phi=0}^{2 \pi} r^2 \, \sin{\theta} \, d \theta \, d \phi \, dr \frac{A \cos{\theta}}{4 \pi r^2} \int\limits_{\frac{r}{\Delta t}}^{+\infty} g(v) \, dv ##. ## \\ ## The ##\phi ## integral gives ## 2 \pi ##, and the ## \sin{\theta} \cos{\theta} \, d \theta ## integral gives ## \frac{1}{2} ##, so we have ## N=\frac{nA}{4} \int\limits_{r=0}^{+\infty} dr \, \int\limits_{v=\frac{r}{\Delta t}}^{+\infty} g(v) \, dv ##. ## \\ ## Reversing the order of integration, it becomes ## N=\frac{nA}{4} \int\limits_{v=0}^{+\infty} g(v) \, dv \, \int\limits_{r=0}^{v \, \Delta t} \, dr ## , which gives the result ## N=\frac{nA \, \Delta t}{4} \int\limits_{v=0}^{+\infty} g(v) v \, dv=\frac{nA \, \Delta t \, \bar{v}}{4} ##. ## \\ ## Finally, ## R=\frac{N}{A \, \Delta t}=\frac{n \bar{v}}{4} ##. ## \\ ## Note: The reason for the ## v=\frac{r}{\Delta t } ## term on the lower limit of the velocity distribution is that the particle needs to be moving fast enough to get to the aperture in time ## \Delta t ##. The derivation basically assumes a collisionless gas. The fraction of particles that are moving in the direction of the aperture is ## \frac{A \cos{\theta}}{4 \pi r^2} ##. The aperture ## A ## is assumed to be small. ## \\ ## The coordinate system is a spherical coordinate system whose origin is at the aperture. The gas is in the upper hemisphere above the aperture, and the density is uniform, and the speed distribution function, ## g(v) ## (normalized to 1), is independent of position. ## \\ ## ======================================================================== ## \\ ## The above result is very useful in doing a derivation of the Planck blackbody function, where the cavity is assumed to contain a photon gas of particles all moving at speed ## c ##, so that ## \bar{v}=c ##.
Thank you very much! It's a really nice demonstration. The only thing I still didn't get it is the fraction of particles being ##\frac{A\cos\theta}{4\pi r^2}##. The ##cos(\theta)## term came from the flux of particles emerging from A? Also, why ##4\pi r^2## and not ##2\pi r^2## if the gas is in the upper hemisphere?
 
Airton Rampim said:
Thank you very much! It's a really nice demonstration. The only thing I still didn't get it is the fraction of particles being ##\frac{A\cos\theta}{4\pi r^2}##. The ##cos(\theta)## term came from the flux of particles emerging from A? Also, why ##4\pi r^2## and not ##2\pi r^2## if the gas is in the upper hemisphere?
The calculation is simply computing what goes out the aperture. As viewed from a location at ## (r, \theta, \phi) ##, the aperture looks like it has area ## A \cos{\theta} ##. (The circular aperture will look like an oval or ellipse when viewed from angle ## \theta ##). Meanwhile from that point at ## (r,\theta, \phi) ##, the particles will emanate uniformly in all directions, and the computation basically computes what fraction passes through the aperture of area ## A ##, (projected area of ## A \cos{\theta} ##), that cross the surface at radius ## r ## with surface area ## 4 \pi r^2 ##. That fraction is ## \frac{A \cos{\theta}}{4 \pi r^2} ##. ## \\ ## The contributions of all of the various locations in the entire hemisphere are then summed in an integral.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Airton Rampim
Charles Link said:
The calculation is simply computing what goes out the aperture. As viewed from a location at ## (r, \theta, \phi) ##, the aperture looks like it has area ## A \cos{\theta} ##. Meanwhile from that point at ## (r,\theta, \phi) ##, the particles will emanate uniformly in all directions, and the computation basically computes what fraction passes through the aperture of area ## A ##, (projected area of ## A \cos{\theta} ##), that cross the surface at radius ## r ## with surface area ## 4 \pi r^2 ##. That fraction is ## \frac{A \cos{\theta}}{4 \pi r^2} ##. ## \\ ## The contributions of all of the various locations in the entire hemisphere are then summed in an integral.

Ok, now I got it. Thank you again!
 
  • Like
Likes Charles Link
Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...
Scalar and vector potentials in Coulomb gauge Assume Coulomb gauge so that $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A}=0.\tag{1}$$ The scalar potential ##\phi## is described by Poisson's equation $$\nabla^2 \phi = -\frac{\rho}{\varepsilon_0}\tag{2}$$ which has the instantaneous general solution given by $$\phi(\mathbf{r},t)=\frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\int \frac{\rho(\mathbf{r}',t)}{|\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r}'|}d^3r'.\tag{3}$$ In Coulomb gauge the vector potential ##\mathbf{A}## is given by...
Dear all, in an encounter of an infamous claim by Gerlich and Tscheuschner that the Greenhouse effect is inconsistent with the 2nd law of thermodynamics I came to a simple thought experiment which I wanted to share with you to check my understanding and brush up my knowledge. The thought experiment I tried to calculate through is as follows. I have a sphere (1) with radius ##r##, acting like a black body at a temperature of exactly ##T_1 = 500 K##. With Stefan-Boltzmann you can calculate...
Back
Top