Ratio of Electron's Charge to Mass

  • Thread starter Thread starter Soaring Crane
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charge Mass Ratio
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the experimental measurement of the electron's charge-to-mass ratio (e/m), which yielded an average value of 2.055*10^11 C/kg and a standard deviation of 2.003*10^10 C/kg, while the theoretical value is 1.759*10^11 C/kg. The difference between the experimental and theoretical values is 2.960*10^10 C/kg, raising questions about the relationship between standard deviation and this difference. It is clarified that standard deviation measures variability around the mean, while the difference indicates how far the experimental result is from the theoretical value. The results suggest that while the experimental mean is close to the theoretical value, it lies outside the standard deviation range, indicating potential areas for further measurement refinement.
Soaring Crane
Messages
461
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I think my inquiry is mostly geared at statistics, but physics is involved, too.

In measuring the e/m ratio for an electron, the experimental average e/m value of the data points is 2.055*10^11 C/kg.

The standard deviation for the data points is 2.003*10^10 C/kg using sqrt[(1/n)*sigma(x – mean)^2].

The theoretical e/m ratio value is 1.759*10^11 C/kg.


In taking the difference between the experimental value and the theoretical value, it is

|2.055*10^11 C/kg - 1.759*10^11 C/kg| = 2.960*10^10 C/kg.


Are the standard deviation and the difference between the theoretical/experimental values supposed to be the same?

If they do not match each other (2.003*10^10 C/kg and 2.960*10^10 C/kg), is it because the standard deviation focuses on the difference in relation to the mean while 2.960*10^10 C/kg actually reflects a comparison with the true e/m value? I'm confused at what these two values reveal about the error in the experiment.


Homework Equations



See above.

The Attempt at a Solution



See above.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your experimental results can be formulated in the form

(2.1 +- 0.2)*10^11 C/kg

this means that there are a 68% (the std dev assumes a gaussian distribution around the average) probability that your experimental em ratio will fall within the indicated interval.

The theoretical value falls just outside of this interval. More measurements might enlarge the std dev and bring it within the interval. But really, it is close enough.
 
@Soaring Crane:

As andrevdh already wrote you can write:
(2.1 +- 0.2)*10^11 C/kg
Why doesn't it make sense to write
(2.055 +- 0.2003)*10^11 C/kg

Ideally your mean value lies within the standard deviation. What could be the reason that your mean value lies outside the standard deviation?

You measured a mean value of 2.1*10^11 C/kg with a standard deviation of 0.2*10^11 C/kg.
Is this a good result if you compare the standard deviation to your mean value?

The theoretical value is given as 1.759*10^11 C/kg. What is the error of this value and compare this error to yours.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K