Relative Velocity of a Car on a Moving Truck

  • Thread starter Thread starter JackRuby
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Relativity
JackRuby
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
I was just asked a physics type question that is puzzling me. Perhaps I'm over thinking it.

Q. Suppose that there is a flat bed truck traveling at 30 miles/hour relative to the ground. The truck has an infinitely long bed. A car (sitting) on the bed is traveling at 35 miles and hour relative to the truck bed (per its speedometer). What is the speed of the car irelative to the ground? Assume that the car is traveling the same direction.

My guess is 65 Mi/hr

What is the technical explanation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Galilean Relativity

You are correct. It's an example of the "addition of velocities" formula:
V_{a/c} = V_{a/b} + V_{b/c}.

This also illustrates what is called Galilean relativity, or how to transform from one moving frame to another.

Note that if the speeds involved are high enough, one must use Einstein's special relativity and a different formula for velocity addition to get an accurate answer.
 
Great!

Thanks...

I appreciate your help.

JR
 
I asked a question here, probably over 15 years ago on entanglement and I appreciated the thoughtful answers I received back then. The intervening years haven't made me any more knowledgeable in physics, so forgive my naïveté ! If a have a piece of paper in an area of high gravity, lets say near a black hole, and I draw a triangle on this paper and 'measure' the angles of the triangle, will they add to 180 degrees? How about if I'm looking at this paper outside of the (reasonable)...
Thread 'Relativity of simultaneity in actuality'
I’m attaching two figures from the book, Basic concepts in relativity and QT, by Resnick and Halliday. They are describing the relativity of simultaneity from a theoretical pov, which I understand. Basically, the lightning strikes at AA’ and BB’ can be deemed simultaneous either in frame S, in which case they will not be simultaneous in frame S’, and vice versa. Only in one of the frames are the two events simultaneous, but not in both, and this claim of simultaneity can be done by either of...
Back
Top