I Ricci tensor from this action

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter ergospherical
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    action Tensor
ergospherical
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Education Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
1,097
Reaction score
1,384
Here is an action for a theory which couples gravity to a field in this way:$$S = \int d^4 x \ \sqrt{-g} e^{\Phi} (R + g^{ab} \Phi_{;a} \Phi_{;b})$$I determine\begin{align*}
\frac{\partial L}{\partial \phi} &= \sqrt{-g} e^{\Phi} (R + g^{ab} \Phi_{;a} \Phi_{;b}) \\
\nabla_a \frac{\partial L}{\partial(\nabla_a \Phi)} &= 2\sqrt{-g} e^{\Phi} g^{ab} (\Phi_{;a} \Phi_{;b} + \Phi_{;ba})
\end{align*}giving ##R = g^{ab} (\Phi_{;a} \Phi_{;b} + 2\Phi_{;ba})##. Now vary the action with respect to the metric,\begin{align*}
\frac{\delta S}{\delta g^{ab}} &= -\frac{1}{2}\sqrt{-g} e^{\Phi} g_{ab} (R + g^{cd} \Phi_{;c} \Phi_{;d}) + \sqrt{-g} e^{\Phi}(\frac{\delta R}{\delta g^{ab}} + \Phi_{;a} \Phi_{;b}) \end{align*}Put ##\delta R_{ab} / \delta g^{ab} = R_{ab}## and insert the previous equation for ##R##. Zero the variation and cancel the common factor ##\sqrt{-g} e^{\Phi}##,$$0 = -g_{ab} g^{cd} (\Phi_{;c} \Phi_{;d} + \Phi_{;dc}) + R_{ab} + \Phi_{;a} \Phi_{;b}$$This should give ##R_{ab} = \Phi_{;ba}## but it doesn't work out that way because the indices are mangled. Can somebody see the error?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ergospherical said:
Here is an action for a theory
Is there a particular source from which you got this? It looks like it might be the general action for one kind of scalar-tensor theory of gravity.
 
It's just a very old exam. I presumed it was just something arbitrary the examiner thought up, but may have some application.
 
Not sure if you eventually managed to figure it out but your error is you're overloading indices when taking the variations. Generally speaking, it's better to give separate indices for the field you're taking variations with respect to, compared to the indices in the quantity you're computing variations of.

We have $$\frac{\delta S}{\delta \nabla_c \Phi} = 2\sqrt{-g}e^{\Phi}\nabla^c \Phi,$$ hence $$\nabla_c\frac{\delta S}{\delta \nabla_c \Phi} = 2\sqrt{-g}e^{\Phi}\nabla^c \nabla_c \Phi.$$ Thus $$R = 2\nabla^a \nabla_a \Phi - \nabla^a \Phi \nabla_a \Phi.$$

We can now compute ##\frac{\delta S}{\delta g^{ab}}##. The general expression you calculated is indeed correct: $$R_{cd} = \frac{\delta S}{\delta g^{cd}} = \sqrt{-g}e^{\Phi}\left(\frac{\delta R}{\delta g^{cd}} - \frac{1}{2}g_{cd}R + \nabla_c \Phi \nabla_d \Phi - \frac{1}{2}g_{cd}\nabla^e \Phi \nabla_e \Phi\right).$$

We have $$\frac{\delta R}{\delta g^{cd}} = 2\nabla_c \nabla_d \Phi - \nabla_c \Phi \nabla_d \Phi.$$ Plugging in for ##R## we find the desired result $$R_{ab} = \nabla_a \nabla_b \Phi.$$

Hope that helps!
 
  • Like
Likes ergospherical
Yeah, it was a mistake in ##\nabla_a \frac{\partial L}{\partial(\nabla_a \Phi)}##. Hard for me to figure out why it happened. :)
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
Back
Top